Ewww default exports. Explicit named exports are better! And so it begins
How very dare you share my opinion!
Python is fine as a language I guess
But python programmers give it a bad name. I’ve never seen “well written” python code, it’s always shit that’s been thrown together cos it works.
How about some
fun?funis the punchable face of keywords. I don’t know why, but I hate it.How about some
fninstead?pub async fn foo() -> Pin>>>>>oh fuck commonmark cant display the syntax :( well anyone who has done async rust can imagine
Pin<Box<dyn Future<Output=Result<AsyncResponseThatYouWillHaveToAwaitAgain<ActualResultType>, InscrutableErrorTypeThatDoesntImplementDisplay>> + Send + Sync + 'static + 20MillionMoreAutoTraits>>
Exactly, now we are talking
Who doesn’t use arrow functions?
Arrow functions should be used only for callbacks. I hate that people has started defining named functions with arrow functions in JS. Arrow functions are not hoisted and the ordering of your functions is going to get wonky, because you need to define all you functions first before composing them, when it should be the other way around. Start with the most high-level function which calls lower level functions.
