I considered deleting the post, but this seems more cowardly than just admitting I was wrong. But TIL something!

    • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      As a mathematician, I tend to disagree with this common truism because it limits one’s ability to think about transfinites and suggests there’s a widely agreed upon technical definition of “number”.

      • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        There is, though. Maybe not wide in your inner circle, but very, very wide if you actually look around.

        • Kogasa@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          Ex-mathematician here, almost certainly in a different “circle,” no there isn’t. There are widely accepted standard definitions of things like integer, rational, real or complex number. But “number” is not really well defined. Frege’s Foundations of Arithmetic contains a classical exploration of this exact question if you’d like some perspective.

          • assa123@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            How can you be an ex-mathematician? Maybe is a language barrier (English is not my main language), but I thought that was a designation based on your knowledge.

            • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              At least where I’m from, if someone were to say that they are a mathematician, they usually mean they are employed as a mathematician. So people will say ex-mathematician so the listener does not reach the wrong conclusion.

              • assa123@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Thank you vm for the explanation, I was under the wrong idea that “mathematician” meant someone that knows mathematics, and just as being a hacker or an erudite, it couldn’t be lost. Btw, I am a Financial Math PhD candidate, you saved me from potentially awkward conversations.

                • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Don’t worry. It wouldn’t be a faux pas or anything. People often say “I studied math.” (US) or “I read [past tense] maths.” (UK) to mean they have mathematical knowledge.

                  PS: I’ve never been to the UK. I only put that bit in to have the brits explain it to you.