popcar2@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 6 months agoDynamic Programming is not Black Magic – Quentin Santosqsantos.frexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up133arrow-down15
arrow-up128arrow-down1external-linkDynamic Programming is not Black Magic – Quentin Santosqsantos.frpopcar2@programming.dev to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squaretatterdemalion@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·6 months ago “Daemon”, for a process that is detached from your terminal That’s factually incorrect. Daemons are often spawned from “early” processes whose ancestors are not TTYs.
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 months agoNo, seriously. Article probably means background processes. Maybe aplies to session-daemons or user-daemons. Other daemons (udev, logrotate) were started long before there was any shell.
minus-squareericjmorey@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-26 months ago “Cascading Style Sheets”, just to mean that properties can be overridden This one is really wrong too. But I think his overall point is made clear by other examples. Nomenclature tends toward jargon in software culture. But that’s true in any field.
That’s factually incorrect. Daemons are often spawned from “early” processes whose ancestors are not TTYs.
No, seriously. Article probably means background processes. Maybe aplies to session-daemons or user-daemons. Other daemons (udev, logrotate) were started long before there was any shell.
This one is really wrong too. But I think his overall point is made clear by other examples. Nomenclature tends toward jargon in software culture.
But that’s true in any field.