For me, driving. Its not that driving is difficult or i’m just not able to drive. Its that there are just too many awful drivers and pedestrians you have to care about on the road.
For me, driving. Its not that driving is difficult or i’m just not able to drive. Its that there are just too many awful drivers and pedestrians you have to care about on the road.
deleted by creator
Public lynchings were also a spectacle that was advertised out of state. You could take a drive to visit multiple lynchings as a road trip. It wasn’t uncommon to bring your kids and to take souveniers from the victim. It is untaught because America wants it forgotten
It seems they edited their original comment. They were discussing the commonality of lynchings
Oh. I wonder why they changed it?
Judging from post history it is a privacy thing. They seem to do this with comments after they reach a certain age
“Souvenirs” sometimes being a polite way to say “body parts,” which were not always removed after death.
Am I seeing the same comment you replied to?
Unfortunately the OP edited their original message. See my other comment in this thread. It would seem that they clear their comment history by editing their old comments rather than deleting. may be automated
Yup, there were even black defense groups and militias (and are still many today), like the Deacons for Defense.
But you won’t learn about them in school, on purpose, and you’re taught the illegitimacy of Malcolm X’ ideology and the Nation of Islam on purpose. The state wants you to think that peaceful protest is the only acceptable and legitimate means of protest.
I’ll say mostly yes, but there was one thing in my school textbooks that contradicted that narrative. It was this picture of Malcolm X and Dr. King:
I felt I got a semi-decent education in public schools about the Civil Rights era hitting the highlights of:
With all of that picture of Malcolm X and Dr. King said something to me that words in the textbook never did. Dr. King, the man who preached non-violence and moved the USA forward to a better future chose to meet with Malcolm X. Malcolm X could not have been “all bad” or illegitimate if Dr. King wanted to interact with him. Further, after seeing pictures and film from Bloody Sunday (Edmund Pettus Bridge crossing), Malcolm X’s actions made much more sense.
Malcolm’s autobiography is a very good read.
The nation of Islam is not without fault of it’s own though, none that justified the actions of the state, but still not exactly a beacon of morality.
Like most religions, but particularly for those sorts of cult of personally spinoff “new religions”, I’d say it’s far too caught up in its own woo to ever be taken seriously.
The messaging about not needing to confirm to the religious identity imposed upon people of color by their oppressors is well and good, but replacing it with something arguably worse is not the way.
Yeah, like most cults it doesn’t seem like it’s so bad on the surface, but once you start digging deeper into it things very quickly go off the rails.