weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agoNo arguments heresub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square132fedilinkarrow-up1979arrow-down186
arrow-up1893arrow-down1imageNo arguments heresub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square132fedilink
minus-squaredanhab99@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 days agoNot if this square is a projection of a curved surface
minus-squareYiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 day agoIf it is a projection, then there are more than two curved sides, which also begs credence to the interpretability of the angles they intersect.
minus-squaredanhab99@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 day agoWell angles between 3 points are always going to be angles. If your choose a different configuration of dimensional parameters you can effectively project a square from the 2D plane into this exact shape, then logically the angles would follow.
minus-squareYiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoYou lost me at 3 points. Could you dumb it down a bit?
Not if this square is a projection of a curved surface
If it is a projection, then there are more than two curved sides, which also begs credence to the interpretability of the angles they intersect.
Well angles between 3 points are always going to be angles. If your choose a different configuration of dimensional parameters you can effectively project a square from the 2D plane into this exact shape, then logically the angles would follow.
You lost me at 3 points. Could you dumb it down a bit?