Nearly a thousand treasonous rioters were convicted and needed to be pardoned by the Criminal-in-Chief
Why aren’t you just blocking Hilarious Chaos?
I haven’t posted there in about three months.
Exactly. If someone doesn’t like a poster/community/instance, just block and move on. I don’t even understand why someone would post or keep in touch with a community they totally disagree with.
They won’t change the main poster’s minds, and people who hate the community already agree with them. So what is the point?
Removed by mod
This is the scariest comment I’ve read in a really long time. You’ve earned my upvote, sir! Edit: Had to take away my upvote, cuz you ended up being insane. :/
This person you replied to is an anti-ai user impersonating a moderator of an AI community. They’ve used the stolen name to spam multiple threads here with disgusting sexual and transphobic posts.
Removed by mod
Apparently this made @catloaf@lemm.ee mad enough to downvote this whole post.
catloaf downvotes almost everything.
You’re not wrong.
This is interesting, how do you see these?
Y’all care way too much about imaginary Internet points
I’m more interested in behaviors than upvotes/downvotes and davel’s observation is fascinating.
Removed by mod
This seems off-topic. Not sure why you felt the need to post a user’s downvote count when they aren’t involved in your OP complaint, and they aren’t a mod for the sub you’re complaining about. As far as I can tell, they have nothing to do with your original complaint?
I agree, that’s a dick move, and off topic.
BPR - Bait-Provoked Reaction. Seems it was posted to a conservative community just to provoke reaction. (Edited comment to remove pointing to OP because OP wasn’t the poster of the comment that got removed.)
The clown struggles with reality again. I’ve found it’s not even worth my time engaging with him.
Were you the one who called them a clown and got the comments removed cause you hurt their feelings?
Sure was lol. It’s his name afterall!
I know.
It’s like if they got butthurt if you called them Chuckles.
Here’s the removed comment with the ‘moderator’ in question.
Be sure to let everyone know that it’s a community called “Conservative” that it was posted to.
Yeah, sorry mate, but this is BPR.
You went trolling and got a bite.
I actually wasn’t involved in that conversation I just found it to be an abuse of Chuckle’s power.
Removed by mod
I don’t trust the courts, I don’t believe in the laws, and I would not empower government thugs to shoot any protesters including babbit.
but if you can show a cop was murdered j6 I would look at your evidence.
at this point, I think ydi
the medical examiner reported that Sicknick had no injuries, and died of natural causes.[
but later commented that “all that transpired played a role in his condition”.[9][4][13] The ruling was criticized by some expert neurologists, who argued that stress resulting from the insurrection at the Capitol may have caused the stroke.
that’s not murder
Felony murder, also known as the felony murder rule, is a legal doctrine that makes a person liable for murder if someone dies during the commission of a felony, even if the person didn’t intend to kill anyone.
that’s not what happened in this case
In the first year following the January 6th Capitol riot, 391 individuals were charged with felonies, while 325 were charged with misdemeanors. Among those who pleaded guilty, 32% (327) were charged with felonies, and 68% (682) with misdemeanors. More than 1,500 individuals have been charged with federal crimes related to the riot, with many receiving sentences, including incarceration, probation, or fines.
Felonies + death during felonies = felony murder
Says who?
if you think that’s murder, we can’t agree on what murder is.
the crime of unlawfully and unjustifiably killing a person
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/murder
Seems to fit the definition to me. It was unlawful, unjust, and killed him.
What are your feelings on “castle doctrine”?
it doesn’t apply to government thugs in public buildings
Disengage.
Content censorship but you were shilling pretty hard, I think that’s what got them triggered
Anything less than complete loyalty to Trump is triggering to those snowflakes.
I understand why they have their safe spaces.
I understand why they have their safe spaces.
Then people shouldn’t insist going into the “safe” spaces, and posting stuff that is against that community’s spirit.
Document the behavit for the anals of history?
But isn’t that bad faith? If they are going someplace safe to talk amongst themselves and not posting their stuff in other places, then let them be. It’s already documented because they are on Lemmy.
If this is a repeat act the sure, that would be bad faith.
But i also never seen reports on this community here. I didn’t even know there places for alt right to congrate on fedi.
So good there is but also tankies and normies get this treatment so I am not sure why alt right get an exemption tbh
But i also never seen reports on this community here.
There have been other posts about this community, in fact, I think from OP.
So good there is but also tankies and normies get this treatment so I am not sure why alt right get an exemption tbh
Oh, I’m not saying alt right should get an exemption, I’m saying I think it’s bad faith, regardless of the community. If it’s a community just for a particular political leaning, I think it’s bad form to just post stuff in there to stir stuff up.
Also, regarding the OP: the person posting didn’t get banned, just had their post removed. So I don’t see it as on over-reach of the mod’s power. His (or her) community, and they can dictate what’s appropriate content in it.
I agree with your general sentiment on this. It’s the same concept as anti-AI trolls shit stirring in posts from genAI communities. It’s a pointless exercise getting butthurt about it when they get banned.
BPR. I’m certainly not defending the community though. We defederated from that instance a while back over their right wing communities afaik.
Removed by mod
I’m not involved in your original complaint, nor am I a mod of the community that your complaint is about. Not sure why you’re mentioning me. I also don’t know anything about the Saiko person or the Saiko instance. No idea what you are even trying to imply.
I only mentioned you in my comments because you’re the poster of the OP and asking for opinions by posting here.
No idea what they’re implying either. I downvoted them because I didn’t think the comment actually further discussion and specifically shuts down any meaningful discussion. Apparently that is “some interesting attention”.
//shrug
Removed by mod
@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com why was this removed for being off topic?
It did not break any of the community or instance rules and it was furthering the conversation that was forming in the comments.
Stay in the topic of the post. Starting slap fights about downvotes is not in scope of his comm.
With your permission because I’d have to be reposting moderated content I’d like to create a new post about this to leave it to the community to vote if that comment was off topic based on the context or not.
Holy shit don’t you have anything better to do? Whatever, post away about the injustice that happened today
Thank you this is the most exciting thing that’s happened to me all day and possibly all week.
I’ve never cared about downvotes much less tried to start slap fights about them I was interested what a publicly accessible private Lemmy community was.
You can read the mod log. No reason to harass anyone when the reason is already spelled out.
But since you want to take screenshots and question my instance.
It’s effectively a single user instance. That is what I mean by private lemmy instance. I have a handful of users on my instance that are all people I directly know. The implication is that I will not accept general people signing up to my instance, thus “private”.
No one is being harassed here I’m asking about a moderator action in a community about moderator actions.
Off-topic is not a rule of the community or dozer0’s instance and amusingly enough it’s the same reasoning as the OP’s comment’s removal.
Off-topic is not a rule of the community
Uhh you sure about that chief?
Post only about bans or other sanctions that you have received from a mod or admin.
It’s right there… first rule. My sidebar of my instance has nothing to do with this post, or mods, or admins, or any sanctions you would receive.
You got but hurt that I (and somebody else) downvoted you and then started asking questions about my instance, without even tagging me to ask me… That’s literally the definition of off topic. That is the reason it was removed. What more discussion would tagging db0 net you?
BTW… I downvoted you because I didn’t think the comment actually further discussion and specifically shuts down any meaningful discussion. Not sure what the verbiage in my sidebar has to do with any of that.
It was a comment not a post and it was on topic in the topics that were naturally forming in the comments.
