• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The number of hypotheses we’ve proven, mostly. Also, we have this whole field of non-Euclidean geometry. And the modern Pythagoreans are a lot more chill about people knowing the irrationality of Pi.

    • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah but I mean revision not additive change. From what I remember nothing in elements is wrong. I don’t think anyone proved that last postulate

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nothing is wrong, it’s just more incomplete than a modern book.

        But if you’re at the 101 level, sure. It works fine.