• grue@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Since the consensus seems to be that I overreacted, I reversed the ban.

  • Universal Monk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Brah, I get how you’re feeling, but your post will not be welcomed here. I commend you for trying though.

    Always wait for the complaint before ya defend yourself. Always.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    YPTB here starting to have the effect of mods front-running their own reports. Amazing stuff :)

  • SomeLemmyUser@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Wrong community, did you mean AITA?

    To your point though:

    Tldr: IMHO you overreacted.

    While i am totaly on your side regarding the abolishment of car-societies, you banned/removed someone for “direct insult” who made a comment about a general group of people.

    Especially since you (and most people on the sub) don’t even argue for the point he is making fun of, this is clearly no direct insult against any particular person.

    While his comment IS stupid (IMHO) and IS a strawman argument (so doesn’t add anything to discussion but rather steer towards a direction I find non-constructive) It IS also clearly a hyperbol and IS clearly NOT directly insulting a particular person.

    So even if I share your annoyment regarding such people, I think you went full reddit mode and abused your powers. Just my humble opinion, feel free to disagree

    While I find it legitimate to ban people who repeatedly only derail and insult for the fun of it, I don’t think banning people not getting the point or using graphic language fosters a good discussion culture or gets anyone to change their views or educate themself but just leads to a circle jerk. The point when to assume someone is acting in bad faith is not easy to define, but especially if this is a oneoff its definitely not reached in my opinion.

    While you can mod your sub this way, I don’t think it helps for reaching our goal and its not the moderation I would like to see.

    judgment: PTH(uman)

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well, this comm is modeled after AITA. I guess mods can post their own acts and get judgement. Our version of “YTA” is “PTB” or “YDI” depending on who’s posting.

    • grue@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Are you suggesting that disparaging the whole community and making blatantly fallacious arguments stops being toxic behavior just because he tried to take refuge in audacity? If it had been tongue-in-cheek I can maybe see that, but in my opinion his intent clearly remained mean-spirited.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        Leave it up and let the community rip them a new ass. That’s much better optics than deleting and banning.

      • SomeLemmyUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        He is not disparaging the whole community. As you said “there must be zero personal powered vehicles” is not a position the community has.

        You can’t say “fallacious arguments” AND “disparaging the whole community”

        Only one of the two can be accurate. IMO it’s fallacious arguments, which is not a good reason to remove or ban IMHO.

        The reaction to stupid arguments should be good arguments or education, not removal.

        You assume a whole lot about the person, if this is the only mistake he made. Maybe its just a 15yo who seriously doesn’t understand the difference. If he has a (long) history of purposefully misunderstanding the point and derailing its a different story. If not you are banning him for a bad argument you don’t agree with. That’s absolutely power tripping reddit mod behavior.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    so what other choice did I have but to ban him?

    Removing the comment or just ignoring it were also valid choices. You did in fact “go full reddit mod”, I guess.