HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 days agoWhy make it complicated?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1102arrow-down118file-textcross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
arrow-up184arrow-down1imageWhy make it complicated?lemmy.mlHiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square52fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
minus-squareByteWelder@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 day agoIn Kotlin, you can have the type become implicit with the former syntax: let text = number.toString() (text is a String here)
minus-square𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-212 hours agoYou can also do that in TypeScript readonly a!: Foo; readonly b = bar.toFoo(); constructor(){ a = bar.toFoo(); }
In Kotlin, you can have the type become implicit with the former syntax:
let text = number.toString()(textis aStringhere)You can also do that in TypeScript
readonly a!: Foo; readonly b = bar.toFoo(); constructor(){ a = bar.toFoo(); }