• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      You don’t seem to care about consistency or established analysis either, you just jump to whatever is contrarion. You didn’t actually engage with the Marxist critique of Imperialism, you just handwave it away. What are you trying to do?

      • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        I mean, I’m the only one here who tried to analyze the survey posted, while you all are just like “See? Numbers! Good numbers”

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 days ago

          You gave suggestions for improvement then said as it stands it isn’t relevant at all, which I would say goes far too far. It’s useful, and accurate. I don’t know why you’re trying to play semantical games and try to snarkily avoid discussing Socialist theory on a Socialist comm.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              3 days ago

              You played semantical games with Imperialism and Socialism. Your claims about the data having “literally no validity” weren’t semantics, they were just wrong, the data itself is good even if we can get more data elsewhere.

              • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                3 days ago

                The data is good even if data is missing. Really you can’t see anything wrong eight that? Man…

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  This should be improved with adding more countries, like Russia, then comparing with other important data, like freedom of expression, to be somehow relevant to any discussion

                  These would expand the data and make it more useful. There’s no missing data, though, the data as it exists stands on its own, it’s a comparison of different countries and approval, which is backed up in other studies on CPC approval rates among others.

                  • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    It’s also a comparison of how much people in those countries feel free of criticizing their government then.

                    To be sure it isn’t we should include more countries, first of all, with different kinds of governments. That would be a good start at some kind of more objective discussion based on tangible things.