The data is coming from the world’s largest democracy perception study, published by the Alliance of Democracies Foundation (a Danish-based non-profit organisation).
The data is coming from the world’s largest democracy perception study, published by the Alliance of Democracies Foundation (a Danish-based non-profit organisation).
So the wiki you quoted is the bible and any source saying otherwise is right-deviationism nationalism or otherwise anti socialist element. Or heresy.
Exactly this.
We don’t know, USSR didn’t tell us.
Wealth. Industry. Money.
Hahahaha. We would literally be better off getting the full restitution from Germany. Instead USSR took it too, and told us they will lend us about 15% of it to rebuild.
To be fair, some new technology from USSR was licensed to Poland, but it was expected that the goods will be paid as tribute (“Sold” to USSR at the value below production cost. Source: again, Rolicki pro-PRL historian).
Poland was given to USSR as tribute. We never had a revolution, nor did we want to join USSR. We were broken by Nazis and then finished off by Ruskich. Unless you count everybody as right wing nationalist, Polish people had enough bad history with Russia to not want to be under them.
But this is pointless. To you I’m right wing nationalist or something, to me you’re romanticising USSR, inventing “facts” left and right. You quote a form of wikipedia made by ???, I quote left-wing pro-PRL historian who remembers and read official documents.
Prolewiki is not a “bible.” It’s a sourced collaborative effort to create a wikipedia that isn’t dominated by western and Capitalist bias. Check the sources.
You don’t know why. You simply don’t have the answers, so you’re making them up and inserting them as facts based on what you think is most likely. Socialist Poland saw rapid economic development because of Socialism, along with improvements in women’s rights, life expectancy, literacy rates, and more.
You personally are anti-communist, yes, given your anti-communism. I’m inventing precisely nothing, here, you’ve invented definitions. Prolewiki cites its sources, if you question them you can follow the sources.