cm0002@lemmy.world to Programming@programming.dev · 2 days agoAI Models from Google, OpenAI, Anthropic Solve 0% of ‘Hard’ Coding Problemsanalyticsindiamag.comexternal-linkmessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1470arrow-down15
arrow-up1465arrow-down1external-linkAI Models from Google, OpenAI, Anthropic Solve 0% of ‘Hard’ Coding Problemsanalyticsindiamag.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Programming@programming.dev · 2 days agomessage-square67fedilink
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·1 day ago Well, this kind of AI won’t ever be useful as a programmer It already is.
minus-squarechildOfMagenta@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 day agoYou mean useful to a programmer, or as useful as a programmer?
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·19 hours agoAh - yeah I read that wrong. It’s useful to a programmer.
minus-squarewetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·20 hours agoI explicitly meant “as”. It’s great as autocomplete. Not as an agent to complete programming tasks.
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·19 hours ago It’s great as autocomplete. I love the weird need to downplay just how good AIs are by calling them “autocomplete”.
minus-squarewetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·19 hours agoDid you even read my earlier comment?
It already is.
You mean useful to a programmer, or as useful as a programmer?
Ah - yeah I read that wrong. It’s useful to a programmer.
I explicitly meant “as”. It’s great as autocomplete. Not as an agent to complete programming tasks.
Thanks for clarifying.
I love the weird need to downplay just how good AIs are by calling them “autocomplete”.
Did you even read my earlier comment?