alt text: Scene of The Punisher where he is desperate having a nightmare, captioned “When a tiling window manager user has to use a MacOS/Windows desktop”

  • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’ve been working on my own macOS tiling window manager inspired by Gtile for gnome. I’ll probably put it on github at some point.

      • sanderium@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That is true, animations can make your brain understand that something changed position faster than if they teleported.

    • dukatos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      And if you disable animations, you still have to wait for focus. But the worst behavior is when you minimize a window and later cmd+tab to it and all windows just lose focus.

  • POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Okay give me the short and simple. What window manager should I try. I’m using an off shoot of Fedora.

    • Owl@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      BSPWM + lxqt/ xfce (lxqt recommended)

      You’ll also need SXHKD for better and easier shortcut handling

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Linux developers can’t name their products any better than they name their variables.

        “Programming done, time to publish, now it just needs a name…” briefly pauses, then smashes face into keyboard… “There! … ehh, no, still missing something.” clicks random spot, types X… “Perfect! Send it!”

        • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          For a long time I used the music player ncmpcpp. The name makes perfect sense if you already know what it means and how it relates to other things.

            • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              It did make sense at one point. They implemented a music player with a daemon part and a client part, so from that you had the mpd server and mpc client. Someone wrote an ncurses frontend for the client, naturally called ncmpc. Iirc that person abandoned it and someone else took over with a new iteration. ncmpcpp. But it really is a bad name.

          • Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Neither can Nintendo.

            3DS
            New 3DS
            Wii
            Wii U

            Well, they at least got the name of Switch 2 right. They finally learned.

        • Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          On KDE, I’d recommend getting a KWin Script for tiling. Krohnkite is what people use currently.

          It’s not as buttery smooth as dedicated tiling window managers and it can be a bit glitchy at times, but it is better than one might expect and significantly easier (and likely less glitchy) than trying to get bspwm to work in Plasma.

        • Owl@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Technically you could changethe window manager of KDE Plasma to BSPWM, but I wouldn’t recommend it as it is such a tightly knit package

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Because like most things made for power users: it confuses and terrifies regular users.

      Seriously, even with something as simple as Fancy Zones, regular users would get frustrated when they move a window while accidentally or purposely holding shift and their window reshapes itself.

  • traches@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s true, I’m completely broken. I can’t even use a stacking window manager on Linux, I’m instantly pissed off

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Mac has an absence of window management. it’s like the product owner stopped thinking halfway through the desktop experience and handed it over to the intern.

    when demo day came the PO saw it and was shocked at how horrible it was but had to sell it to save their own ass.

    they opened the whole demo with, “I want you to think about this experience and stop, then…think differently.”

  • Ooops@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    As much as I despise Windows while also using archlinux/i3-wm as my daily driver…

    Tiling is no rocket science. Basically every stacking window manager including Windows can do it well enough to be usable with just a few properly configured defaults and short-keys.

  • Beacon@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    There are tiling window managers for win and mac too, so i don’t think this meme makes sense

    • sudo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Window Managers” don’t exist on windows and mac. There’s third party programs that re-position your windows. But you can’t replace the window manager for these OSs. AFAIK they don’t have a concept of a window manager. Its all one seemless desktop experience.

      Love to be proven wrong or at least shown an adequate alternate. Because pic is me in a few weeks. Goodbye slack, google, and zoom. Hello M$ TEAMS.

      • Beacon@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m not clear on what the distinction is that you’re referring to. How are the Linux window managers different than the win/mac ones?

        • muix@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          Window managers in Linux take direct command from the display server (Xorg, Wayland, etc.) to decide where to position windows and what they should look like. Whereas “window managers” on MacOS/Windows are tricking the original window manager provided by the OS into positioning windows a certain way. I’m simplifying here, but hope that clears things up.

          • Beacon@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Thanks for the info, but what is the functional difference to the end user?

            • Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              15 hours ago

              They’re limited by what the original window manager allows them to do. Sway has its whole own window manager, so it can do whatever it wants.

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            You mean like Windows registry which determines how the windows need to be managed, just like almost every other program running on Windows?

            Your explanation still doesn’t differentiate.

            Or do you claim Linux calls home to some rando server to get the information on how a window should be displayed? Because that doesn’t seem like a great feature at all.

        • sudo@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Window_manager

          • Stacking (aka floating) window managers provide the traditional desktop metaphor used in commercial operating systems like Windows and macOS. Windows act like pieces of paper on a desk, and can be stacked on top of each other. For available Arch Wiki pages see Category:Stacking window managers.
          • Tiling window managers “tile” the windows so that none are overlapping. They usually make very extensive use of key-bindings and have less (or no) reliance on the mouse. Tiling window managers may be manual, offer predefined layouts, or both. For available Arch Wiki pages see Category:Tiling window managers.
          • Dynamic window managers can dynamically switch between tiling or floating window layout. For available Arch Wiki pages see Category:Dynamic window managers.

          Mac and Windows window managers aren’t different from Linux window managers. (Other than being difficult or impossible to replace). What you are calling “window managers” are software that reposition the windows after the actual window manager has positioned it.

      • lobut@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I use Amethyst on Mac and it’s quite good but it is a fancy repositioning system because it bugs out a few times a day and I need to force a refresh.

    • sanderium@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I know there are, the point is to show that FOSS window managers users moved away from commercial enshittified desktop experiemce and are traumatized by it. Basically laughing at my own experiemce with desktop environments.

  • Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    It honestly feels like an alien device to me… wdym, firefox-nightly isn’t just in WS 3, reachable by pressing Super + 3, but somewhere in that list in of Alt + Tab and I have to search that shit?