• iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    yea I already think it is one of the biggest threats but it is just a tool not the source. you destroy this tool they will find another. the problem is billionaires getting intermingled with politics and state affairs. We need a separation of state and billionaire affairs.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      We need to outlaw having more than $100,000,000 in personal wealth. You hit that mark, and you get a “Congratulations! You won Capitalism” medal. Tell them it’s made of unobtanium, but just make it out of a titanium steel alloy.

      After that every single penny they make is poured into “The Sovereign Fund For Humanities Poor.”

      This would absolutely fund UBI, and climate change solutions.

      • gian @lemmy.grys.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Not to demoralize you, but it seems a pretty stupid solution. First because you need to implement it world wide to hope to have some effect and second simply because this way nobody will ever try to go over the limit so your

        This would absolutely fund UBI, and climate change solutions.

        will get exactly 0 funds. So the guy that have 100.000.000 $ in personal wealth is still rich and you don’t have any other resource for your UBI or whatever thing you want to do with them.

        It is what is happening here were we have a lower limit to pay taxes, if you earn less than that you don’t pay taxes (or a very small amount) and people simply avoid to go over the limit. BTW, the limit was introduced exactly with a similar reasoning, even if for different reasons.

      • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        ideally yes but that might take sometime (if one follows a more peaceful approach that is…). This is more like an emergency measure, completely sever ties of billionaires with any politics and state business. If it becomes a norm in some European countries like separation of state and the church, then others would follow hopefully.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          A non-peaceful solution would be preferable. The billionaires have clearly chosen to kill as many of us as they can get away with. Killing them back is just self defense at this point.

          • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            I am also completely OK with redistribution of excess wealth or anything that applies going forward too as long as this mental disease is dealt with and people recognise it for what it is.

          • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Musk alone has killed thousands, subjected thousands to cancer risk, given HIV to babies, fueled violent murder sprees by dozens of radicalized Nazis. Bond villains arent as evil as him, and he gets adoring fans for the death he causes.

  • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Ive been talking to a bunch of my ex friends that voted for trump. It seems the problem isnt neccassarily disinformation, the issue is that people want to be dumb. Most people CANNOT have a single conversation about politics. The lowest level of analysis hurts their brain. They just want someone to rally behind who gives me them an out group. I don’t see a realistic solution to working with these people when they seem dead set against allowing the world to improve. The closest i can think is an education test to vote, but that comes with some serious issues.

    Edit: lmfao

    • dbtng@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      There’s no answer. We are all going to hell. Along with them. Yay for us all.

  • Eheran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I doubt it will be more of a thread than I think it is. I don’t think there is anything that is MORE of a thread.

    • dbtng@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Love the equal up/down vote count in this innocuous comment.
      Do we need it decoded folks?
      This person means to say that they feel misinformation is a huge threat to democracy and this is no surprise at all.
      But they said that in 3 words.