I got this

all good ideas, agreed that it should be soft for maximum effect. maybe also infuse it with chocolate too, to maximize the confusion

it wont taste good as long as the person that bites it does so thinking it is chocolate

I like how you think.

yea well you should first dip them in melted chocolate and cover it with crushed hazelnuts to make sure they look genuine

didnt put it for you specifically, I didnt know about this and found this while searching. thought others might find it useful. otherwise I agree it is stupid they dont go to something like a legal or hr department but harass teams directly (even if they were using it imo). they might be thinking along the lines “lets pester their teams, they will take it up with whatever the relevant department is”

https://www.datacamp.com/blog/navigating-anaconda-licensing

whack-a-billionaire?

“lets just film Trump and Elon instead of vaulttec”

because they might interfere with the elections. oh wait…

what peer review? This is likely one of the many reviewless journals that solely exist to publish, for a generous fee, shit that wouldn’t even pass as an undergrad homework. people then can write in their CVs for grant applications or position applications in low tier universities etc The name of the journal is usually chosen to look fancy and very international so it looks good on your CV. Honestly there are so many such journals now, no one person would be able to tell which is which, it’s a complete mess. Humans find a way of fucking up everything for profit.

6? That is generous.

well unfortunately these shortages do not generally affect billionaires (not directly atleast).

I have to say I do like not having to worry about things like “does my OS take screenshots and send it somewhere to be used as an AI training set” and “do I have to accept the OS update they are shoving down my throat so that I basically sell my privacy for not having security problems”. There is enough of that elsewhere already.

which means they also don’t have cloth hangers with clips so you need to pack one each time…

I am talking about the Sanders vote though. I think, there were about 10 that said yes to stop selling weapons.

No they are not but I am convinced that about 2/3 of the democrats don’t give a shit about the party they are a member of nor its voters. If their only opportunity was to be a republican candidate they would jump at that opportunity without any internal moral conflicts. And I understand how frustrating it must be when a majority of a party that you are told to vote for has no moral issues with bombing a country where your relatives live to the ground.

Oh no, I have been a part of disinfographics propagation. Thanks for the correction. It seems some of the older women (31, Laura Whitman for instance) were not a confirmed long term relationship but there are some rumors that DiCaprio romantically pursued them.

I was also on the side of vote for Kamala fix it after because with Trump fixing is impossible with Kamala maybe. But whenever I see stuff like

45 Democrats Vote With GOP to Pass Bill Sanctioning ICC Over Netanyahu Warrant

Senate Overwhelmingly Rejects Sanders Resolutions to Block Arms Sales to Israel

it makes me doubt how feasible this approach would be too. Sure Kamala is factors of magnitude better than Trump for the USA, for Ukraine, for LGBTQ people, for women etc. But I can understand a US citizen with roots in the middle east etc not voting for Democrats after seeing disgusting stuff like this.

I think 27 was chosen specifically too. 26 would have been a tighter upper bound.

ps: just noticed a different version was posted below before, sorry for the repeat