lemm.ee has shut down at 00:14 UTC.

unfortunately I realized too late that I have had hundreds of saved links to posts and comments from there, so I did not have enough time to save them, but anyways it is interesting that maybe a third of the post links I could try were dead. I think linkrot is happening much faster here than on reddit, even if just counting deleted posts.

  • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The reason I’m in lemmy.ml and not some smaller instance is because of problems like the ones showcased here.

    Quite a few instances are managed by non-profits which are much less prone to service disruptions, like https://fedecan.ca/en/ for lemmy.ca.

    The local account would continue being the primary source of access to the content…

    Isn’t that contradictory with the users - content separation?

    note that having a separate hosting service doesn’t mean that the hosting service must be the one managing access to the content.

    That seems contradictory with the previous point. My understanding was that

    • users would use Lemmy.user accounts to browse content (this is the recommended way to avoid user management for the content instance admins)
    • mods would use Lemmy.content accounts to moderate communities (users would have to switch to those type of accounts from the first type if they want to start / mod a community)

    Is this correct, or am I missing something?

    • Ferk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Then I think we had a different understanding. My understanding was something akin to what bluesky does with the PDS, the data service just hosts data and hands it over to the other service which is the one actually doing the indexing of that data and aggregating it into communities. The data of the community might be hosted in the hosting services, but it’s accessed, indexed and aggregated through the authentication service.

      The access management, the accounts, the distribution of data, etc. that’s still in the server managing the federation. That’s the way I understood it, at least (I’m not the person that originally started this train, that was @TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca ).

      This allows the content to potentially not be completely lost if an instance dies because it would be easier to carry your data to another instance without losing it. It’s the same principle as in bluesky but applied to the fediverse.