I made the unfortunate post about asking why people liked Arch so much (RIP my inbox I’m learning a lot from the comments) But, what is the best distro for each reason?

RIP my inbox again. I appreciate this knowledge a lot. Thank you everyone for responding. You all make this such a great community.

  • Cora@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I am using Bluefin, based on Fedora Silverblue. I realized that I was already exclusively using flatpaks for everything except one random app, so I thought why not go all-in?

    Haven’t had to worry about updates or system breakages since, and it’s been great so far.

    I used to use Debian Stable, but since doing SysAdmin work I’ve just become used to the way Fedora / RHEL does things.

  • sakphul@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    For me it’s openSUSE Tumbleweed on my Desktops/Laptops and openSuse Leap on my Servers. The killing Feature for me was the propper BTRFS integration with Snapper for seamless rollbacks in case I borked the system in some way.

    One “downside” for me is the mix of Gnome Settings and Yast on my Desktop. But I like yast on my servers for managing everything (enabling ports in firewall, network config, enable autoamtic isntall of security updates, etc.). Also openSuse is not that common, so sometimes it is hard to find a solution if you have a distribution specific question.

    Personally never looked to closely into openSuse Build Services (OBS). But I know some people who really like it.

  • Azzk1kr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve been using (X)Ubuntu for ages. I just wanted something that “just works”. Tired of too much tinkering and there’s plenty of (non commercial) support. Mixing it with i3 as my window manager.

    Roast me ;)

  • chi-chan~@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago
    • The fricking AUR

    • Nothing I don’t _actually_ need

    • Pacman

    • Everything is the latest version available–ALWAYS.

    • ArchWiki

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Since I mostly use computers for entertainment these days I keep coming back to Bazzite. It’s fast, stable, kept up to date, reliable, and “just works”. I’ve created custom rpm-ostree layers to faff around, but it’s not actually necessary for anything I need.

    I used to keep a second Kubuntu Minimal partition around but I realized I just don’t need it. If I wasn’t so happy with Bazzite, I would probably go with openSUSE or Endeavor.

  • HouseWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    EndeavourOS is the best because.

    It’s currently on my system and said system hasn’t burst into flames yet, so I’m too lazy to change it.

  • ragas@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Gentoo because it is as stable as Debian, less bloated than Arch, has more packages than Ubuntu, is rolling release, can mix and match stable, testing and unstable on a whim.

    Even its one downside, compile times, is now gone if you just choose to use binary packages.

    • kaidezee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      And less stable than Arch, and more bloated than Ubuntu… If that is something you want for whatever reason! It is the most versatile distro in existance because it’s literally anything you want it to be - clean and nice, or total chaos. What is there not to love?

      Gentoo <3

  • fin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    I use debian cause it just works.

    I was a Nix user (more specifically, nix-darwin user) but after being away from the computer for like one year (to study for the university entrance exam), I completely forgot how to use it and resulted in erasing the computer. Nix/NixOS is fun, but it was too complicated for me.

  • WILSOOON@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Arch is the best, the arch wiki is massive, pacman is just amazing, no nvidia drivers bullshitting, and rolling release has only broken one thing once, life under the arch is pretty great

    • D_Air1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Also PKGBUILD’s are the superior packaging format. Back in the day people use to talk about preferring debian or redhat based distros based on how much they liked debs or rpms. Building packages on Arch is easier than pretty much any distro I have ever tried to build packages on.

      • UnityDevice@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I recently needed to build newer versions of some packages for Debian. Now, they’re go based so the official packaging is super complicated and eventually I decided to try and make my own from scratch. After a few more hours of messing with the official tooling I start thinking “there must be a better way.”

        And sure enough, after a bit of searching I found makedeb which allows you to make debs from (almost) regular PKGFILEs. Made the task a million times simpler.

    • hallettj@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Arch wiki is the best! I reference often, even though I’m generally applying the information to other distros

  • monovergent 🛠️@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Debian. Truly the universal operating system. Runs on all of my laptops, desktops, servers, and NAS with no fuss and no need to keep track of distro-specific differences. If something has a Linux version, it probably works on Debian.

    Granted, I am a bit biased. All of my hardware is at least 5 years old. Also came from Windows, where I kept only the OS and browser up to date, couldn’t be bothered with shiny new features. A package manager is already a huge luxury.

    • limelight79@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I know. Stop worrying about your computer and install Debian! It just works. It updates without a problem.

  • malwieder@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Tumbleweed. Rolling release with automated testing (openQA), snapper properly setup out of the box.

    Honestly the entire openSUSE ecosystem. Tumbleweed on my main PC that often has some of the latest hardware, Slowroll on my (Framework) laptop because it’s rolling but slower (monthly feature updates, only fixes in-between), and Leap for servers where stability (as in version/compatibility stability, not “it doesn’t crash” stability) is appreciated.

    openSUSE also comes in atomic flavors for those interested. And it’s European should you care.

    With all that being said, I don’t really care much about what distro I’m using. What I do with it could be replicated with pretty much any distro. For me it’s mostly just a means to an end.