• FizzyOrange@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Nonsense. You are only “supposed” to do that because if you are using Python and you want performance you have no other choice!

    Reminds me of people saying you aren’t “supposed” to store binaries in git - yeah only because git is so bad at it! When we were all using SVN people would have said “you aren’t supposed to have multiple people editing the same file simultaneously” as if it were a fundamental truth.

    And Python isn’t “a glue language”. It’s often used like that but there are many many pure Python projects.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      but like, most of the standard library is written in c. most popular libraries are written in c. they’re built that way because python is a flexible way to glue functionality together. that’s the point of python: it’s easy. if i want performance, i port part of the logic to a compiled language. but most of the time that’s not necessary.

      just like how with git, we have lfs. we build what we need when we need it. i don’t understand your tone here.

      • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        they’re built that way because python is a flexible way to glue functionality together

        Lol no. They’re built that way because it’s fast! Can you imagine how slow Python would be if it was self hosted? Actually I bet someone has tried that…

        Yep - go and benchmark that and get back to me in a few days when it’s finished running hello world, lol.

        just like how with git, we have lfs

        Have you ever actually used LFS? It’s a pretty terrible experience.

          • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 minutes ago

            It’s frustrating when people make excuses for problems - even saying that there isn’t a problem. Like, if everyone was saying “I like Python even though it is extraordinarily slow and will never be fast, which is a shame”… That’s fine. Saying “Python isn’t supposed to be fast and you shouldn’t want that” is delusional.

            It’s not just Python where this phenomenon happens - I gave the example of Git (“you shouldn’t want to version control binaries so the fact that Git sucks at it isn’t really a problem at all!”). Another common one is distributing binaries on Linux - you shouldn’t want to do that so it doesn’t matter that it’s a pain in the bum.

            Pet peeve I guess.

            • lime!@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 minute ago

              when the hell did i say python is supposed to be slow? i just said it’s supposed to be used as a high-level glue to hold low-level things together. different tools have different uses. you’re complaining that a saw is a bad hammer.