If this isn’t just corporate hype, this could be great for making smaller batteries, hopefully less resource intensive.

  • neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’m carefully optimistic. A new “battery tech breakthrough” is reported on every few months without anything coming out of it, but solid state batteries has been talked about for a while and might be the one to actually take over for LiPo (in some circumstances, at least). The tech looks promising, and I’m looking forward to seeing how this technology matures.

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is more than a “breakthrough” IMO. Manufacturers have been eyeing and researching solid states for a long time now. It’s not just a lab toy.

      • Kushan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        And according to the article, some of these are going on sale later this year.

  • Kuvwert@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh another huge groundbreaking battery technology that will very soon change the world!!!

    Let me just log that with the 8436 times I’ve read that in the last 2 decades.

    • xkforce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Over the last two decades battery technology has increased DRASTICALLY. So the cynicism isnt entirely deserved.

      • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It has; but afaik it has been more through incremental improvements rather than huge technological leaps.

        • xkforce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Not exactly. Those technological leaps are spread throughout. It just looks like its entirely incremental even though its not really. It takes time to develop things and along the way the existing tech is refined.

          • Zorque@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Just because the increments aren’t in a straight line doesn’t mean they’re not still incremental.

      • Kuvwert@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I know battery tech is progressing and lithium ion is way advanced, but every month I see a bait article claiming they are revolutionizing the tech and this new technology will DOUBLE or TRIPLE the liion battery… Especially the solid state battery articles. It’s always bait

        • xkforce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          It takes time to develop things. And solid state batteries like this really are promising.

    • bbuez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      If I had a nickel for every groundbreaking battery technology discovered, I could make my own groundbreaking discovery! Just trust me this time

    • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Some of those were dangerous as hell and we won’t see them in consumer use ever, unless somebody wants a very expensive frag grenade.

    • dezmd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Still waiting on those miracle molten salt batteries that are going to revolutionize long term energy storage.

  • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Don’t trust reports, or anything really, coming out of China at face value. Product in hand, undoctored video proof, lab tests done by a trusted group.

  • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    A solid-state battery developer in China has unveiled a new cell that could help change the game for electric mobility.

    Oh yeah? Again?

    Tailan did not mention any specific plans for passenger vehicle integration yet, but did state its latest generation of all-solid-state battery cells are vehicle grade. If the company is able to scale this technology large enough for consumer vehicles while keeping prices down…

    Ah, so more vaporware. Same as usual. Come find me when these technologies actually exist.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    We’ll do fine with 250-300 mile range if charging infrastructure is improved. Use further battery breakthroughs for reducing weight, not increasing range.

    Though the possibility of fully electric airplanes is exciting.

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Increased capacity is reduced weight since now you need less battery for came range. Although I doubt these claims. Improvements in technology are usually marginal, not 5x or more.

  • LimpRimble@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If the company is able to scale this technology large enough for consumer vehicles while keeping prices down …

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      They probably won’t care about keeping costs down if they are developing 1300 miles range batteries that’s gonna be for industrial and military applications. Maybe some very high end consumer use.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Alternatively, they could make smaller versions for consumer vehicles that take up less space/weight.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, this kind of headline is stupid. Any battery can offer any given range if it’s large enough. This kind of thing should be written as distance/mass or, for consumer products, cost/distance.

          • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Even that is meaningless because the vehicle you put a battery in is as important or moreso than the battery.

            Aptera has a claimed 1,000+ mile range with a 100 kWh lithium battery. Meanwhile, the Rivian R1S has a claimed 270 mile range when equipped with a 106 kWh battery.

            The main difference is that the Aptera is a light and aerodynamic car built for maximum efficiency instead of a 6,000 lb pickup truck. Any battery can boast amazing numbers if you are flexible enough with the use case.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              That’s true. I guess it should just be kWh/mass. Either that or we should have a standard vehicle all batteries are tested on for headlines if they want to talk about distance, which is obviously more understandable to the average reader.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        It will start like that, but this tech will become more and more affordable as time goes on.