• loathesome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    It says as much as it does for an LLM but doctors have to have a lot of field experience after passing these tests before they get certified as doctors.

    • beardown@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Then we should remove such tests and, if anything, increase such field experience

        • beardown@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Because clearly passing such tests doesn’t matter. If it did matter then it would be noteworthy and have implications for the labor value of doctors that gpt could pass the tests to a better extent than many of them

          • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            If you can’t read a licence plate at 20 metres you can’t safely drive. Being able to read a licence plate at 20 metres does not make you a safe driver. The test still matters.

          • loathesome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Tests are meant to gatekeep who gets to get the field training required to become a doctor. Sending every jabroni into residency willy-nilly is probably gonna collapse the healthcare system completely.

            • beardown@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              That wouldn’t collapse the health care system, it would devalue the salaries of doctors which would be good for everyone else as it would lower costs. Which is what has happened to practically every other profession