Are you guys fine with these new shenanigans from Github. I found a bug and wanted to check what has been the development on that, only to find out most of the discussion was hidden by github and requesting me to sign-in to view it.

It threw me straight back to when Microsoft acquired Github and the discussions around the future of opensource on a microsoft owned infrastructure, now microsoft is exploiting free work from the community to train its AI, and building walls around its product, are open source contributors fine with that ?

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      Or Forgejo, or cgit, or Aylla, or Radicle, or SSH+HTTP server. There’s loads of options to try. And this is just the options for Git—not to mention the other DVCSs worth looking into.

        • priapus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          The company that makes it seems invested in crypto, but what does radicle itself have to do with it?

          • toastal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            There isn’t anything I see either. The only reference is being built similar to Bitcoin’s Lightning network (while also it says it is inspired by Secure Scuttlebutt & BitTorrent (hence “seeding” a repo)). It doesn’t solve my issues in the space, but it is at least trying something novel.