• verassol@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      the claimants were set back because they’ve been asked to prove the connection between AI output and their specific inputs

      I mean, how do you do that for a closed-source model with secretive training data? As far as I know, OpenAI has admitted to using large amounts of copyrighted content, numberless books, newspaper material, all on the basis of fair use claims. Guess it would take a government entity actively going after them at this point.

        • verassol@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Thank you for sharing. Your perspective broadens mine, but I feel a lot more negative about the whole “must benefit business” side of things. It is fruitless to hold any entity whatsoever accountable when a whole worldwide economy is in a free-for-all nuke-waving doom-embracing realpolitik vibe.

          Frankly, not sure what would be worse, economic collapse and the consequences to the people, or economic prosperity and… the consequences to the people. Long term, and from a country that is not exactly thriving in the scheme side of things, I guess I’d take the former.

    • bitfucker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep. Can’t wait to overfit LLM to a lot of copyrighted work and share it to public domain. Let’s see if OpenAI will get push back from copyright owner down the road.