• streetlights@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Fascinating. It doesn’t look like they controlled for height/weight so it’s not surprising that the grip strength of TW was so much higher than for CW. Agree with their conclusion that a larger cohort is needed for a longitudinal study rather than a cross-sectional one.

    • maniii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      18 days ago

      HRT doesnt level the playing field for benefits gained due to “doping” or “Y-chromosome” development.

      Sports should have “XX-chromosome” category i.e. Female/Women sports. And “XY-chromosome” category i.e. Male/Men sports.

      And if there are sufficient participants, an “All-Gender” category i.e. Open/Neutral sports.

      There is no need to co-opt or include ambiguous situations. Sports should be fair, equal-opportunity and intensely competitive within their segments.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        So you’re advocating generic testing for anyone who wants to play sports? What about people who are neither XX nor XY? Do you expect trans women to share locker rooms with men?

        • maniii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Any sports that is competitive requires testing to ensure that no one cheats or has an unfair advantage. If you are against testing in sports, then sports is not what you are looking for.

          An Open participant category would solve almost every problem. Only the best of the best will win.

          Traditionally, “Women” ( biological XX-chromosome Homo-sapiens ) had their own category due to their inherent physical weakness compared to “Men” ( biological XY-chromosome Homo-sapiens ) in almost every physical category. This allowed “Women” to compete on their own “safe” “fair” “even” “fair” playing field separate from “Men”.

          If you want a sports category “Trans-Woman” or “Trans-Man” or “Trans-any / Non-Binary” PLEASE GO FOR IT ! I am not saying anyone should be excluded from sports. But there are reasons that categories exist in sporting events. Be constructive or don’t it is your choice.

        • maniii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          18 days ago

          It sucks that everything these days get politically and ideologically bent out of shape. I just want to enjoy sports without all the hoopla and co-opting.

          Just too excited waiting for the Paris 2024 to start, hopefully there will be less controversy and more human moments in sports.

          Keep Being a Good Human and Calmly Carry On Being Excellent to One Another !

          :-D

          • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            hopefully there will be less controversy and more human moments in sports.

            Just no trans moments, since they’re all being excluded, but sure, what’s important is that there is no “hoopla” to distract you from your entertainment… 🙄

            • maniii@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              17 days ago

              :smh: If you have to split hairs what is “Human” I cannot help you. Be Awesome or don’t it is eventually every persons choice to act or not act.