If you distribute the emissions on all the consumers, the concert goers then it’s probably negligible. And their fault. So we should attack people who go to music concerts. But really we should attack celebrity culture. Much less funny meme though
If you distribute the emissions on all the consumers, the concert goers then it’s probably negligible. And their fault. So we should attack people who go to music concerts. But really we should attack celebrity culture. Much less funny meme though
This meme has been brought to you by FOX news and the fossil fuel lobby.
I think logically you need the same order of magnitude to remove CO2 from the atmosphere as you gained form burning the fossil fuels. But I’m not sure where the practical limit is.
The only solution that makes remotely sense is using large areas of the ocean where nothing grows anyway and have a fleet of hundreds of ships that seed out algae that grows, absorbs sunlight and CO2 and then rains down on the ocean floor to sequester the carbon. Otherwise we don’t have the land, energy and resources and money to do any of this.
A browser AI to detect AI shenanigans on websites would be awesome. Let the AI wars begin!
Not sure why the link doesn’t work: https://lemmy.ml/c/av1@lemmy.ml (there is also a second community and a av1 discord server.
Fire stick pro max should support av1 but I have no experience with that.
Av1 is the best compression format but it still requires more work to use it well. The tools for x265 are more mature.
Alternatively you could look into av1-svt and av1an (!av1@lemmy.ml). But there are far more tools for x265
You mean we should just cut emissions and not try to remove CO2? Or am I missing something in the article?
I don’t think we can do enough off that list to make enough difference. And we’re already hitting positive feedback cycles so we need some way to remove CO2. I doubt either of those things will happen, but theoretically we need both now.