If nobody attended, what would be getting summarised? I get what you’re saying, I’ve definitely been in organisations that had pointless meetings. “This meeting could have been an email” is a meme for a reason. Others though, it’s where different departments come together and share news/status, different executive/managers give run downs and updates about the company (e.g. chief of ops presents figures and areas that could be improved) and employees can ask questions about these or other pertinent topics.

Because this user didn’t attend. Meetings are generally long form and dynamic. Which can’t be done as efficiently in email. 30-60 minutes meetings are fine to attend in person (in terms of parsing information). Consuming that same information via video after the fact is a chore; as is relying on the note taking skills of another employee. I agree with the user you’re replying to. Note taking is one of the few things AI is decent at.

Hexbear denizen wanders out of their instance to start to JAQ off while posting zero context or evidence. That’s surely the first time that’s happened.

Yeah SharePoint links are cooked. I copied a url from SharePoint and it crashed my remote session with someone and pretty sure its BSoD my device more than once. Upping the file path limit locally won’t help.

You can go to a SharePoint folder on the site and hit “sync” which will then add it to your file explorer if you have OneDrivs. Makes for easier navigation and collaboration. Fucked if I know how end users were meant to divine that.

Im sorry to hear that mate. Understandable that you’ve got a lot on your mind, that sucks. You’re doing well given the circumstances. Hopefully you can put current circumstances behind you in the near future. Take care.

No problem, hope you’re feeling better soon.

That quote is my answer. Anyway, given the type of user you’ve demonstrated yourself to be this isn’t worth continuing with you.

So you had no idea that post was by yiddish? Doubt.

How old is this post trying to sic people on me?

Read the sentence before the one you quoted.

Edit: you also literally justify following them around because of the abuse you received from them when I asked in my screenshot.

Yes out context it can seem that way, but when you’re following a user around commenting on their stuff when you’re clearly in the middle of an argument with them makes it clear you probably aren’t just dropping by to wish their car well. OP post is 2 hours old. Your comment is an hour old. You just happened across another (8h old) post by OP to comment about their cat? Come on.

I’m referring to you commenting on the cat post but posting “I’m in your walls” isn’t really responding to it.

That doesn’t justify someone breaking ToS and engaging in harassment in return but does provide some background I suppose.

If you suspect you’re having an episode; it might be time to take a break from posting. It still doesn’t justify following you around and provoking you.

Right. Well giving how their posting and you’ve claimed to think they’re having an episode; probably doesn’t look good commenting on multiple different post of theirs. Regardless of whether or not it’s justified.

Why are you following this user around taunting them if you think they’re having an episode?

I think it speaks for itself.

It does not.

Edit: For anyone else confuse by this post (you’re not alone) it seems BrainInABox is following this user around and harassing them?

Edit: Now Brain is saying I followed them when I checked out OPs post history and saw them commenting on other post by OP. Yikes. ESH.

Is he doing this with his entra account? Are there any local accounts? Could he just be providing a local admins credentials any time he needs the permission (UAC pop up) but still logged into the Entra ID account? Either way, jump onto (or backstage into) his device and use lusrmgr.msc to check if he’s in the admin group if your sure he’s not an admin in entra. If he is in the admins group (or there’s a dummy account in there he may be using) remove it with the relevant net localgroup command.

Obligatory “read the article” etc. These unofficial patches get flak because some of them include “features” that are the modders preference. The point of unofficial patches is to fix bugs/glitches while remaining essentially vanilla or at least that’s why people want them. Worth noting that mod devs have been grilled for it before.

Man, leave ants outta this, they’re already having a hard time.

Fuck haggling. I set a lower price because I want something in good condition gone and would rather it be used than go to landfill. Set a price and that’s it. People want to haggle on marketplaces because they either have nothing better to do or resell. Don’t be a party to it imo. Makes it much easier because you ignore tyre kickers who obviously don’t read as well.

I’ve not used it extensively but never had it crash and it’s also undergone several large patches in recent times. Give it a go, it’s free after all.