Why wouldn’t it be?

Arch has an installer now

This is so wrong. I would absolutely prefer no comments over incorrect comments, which is exactly what happens when things get over commented

I run arch and use the KDE beta package repo. Literally no problems. No idea what everyone is talking about here.

Omg so this. Also merging main branches into feature branches instead of rebasing.

You don’t lose info as long as the offset is marked correctly

Logging in local time is fine as long as the offset is marked. Everything else I agree with you though

Exactly this. Anyhow makes error handling in rust actually a joy. It’s only something you need to consider if you’re writing a library for others to use, and in that case, it’s good that rust forces you to be very very explicit

That syntax looks atrocious

Are you using an IDE like rustrover? Rust is by far the easiest language I’ve worked with. It makes it so the only way to write code is the right way

Terrible meme. Go is bad and you should feel bad

I read that

You could also frame it as liberals being on the side of religious freedom, though, which might include this shit

No one is trying to take anyone’s freedom. But that freedom includes participating in coercive, sexist, patriarchal practices designed around oppression, which is all that religion is. It doesn’t make it a feel good or wholesome story. Religion is inherently bigoted because it enforces obedience through manipulation

In any case, it’s sort of like, people decrying christianity at large as being shitty when realistically they just mean like, evangelicals, or catholics, or mormons, or jehovah’s witnesses, or maybe in some odd cases, quakers and mennonites

No, ALL christianity is shitty. It’s inherently shitty because its entire purpose is to subjugate through threat of eternal damnation (let alone literal threats and violence). There is literally no other purpose. And this isn’t specific to christianity. It’s inherent to all religions

If your argument is that dresses are the same level of subjugation as hijabs, you’re either trolling or are completely ignorant. It’s not really even comparable in this day. There is basically no pressure for women to only wear dresses anymore. And it’s also not something that’s imposed by a religious rule. It was more of a general patriarchal society issue, which we also have issues with.

They’re basically exactly the same. Someone being generous about something that shouldn’t have been an issue in the first place.

No one’s talking about removing choice. But not all choices are equally valid. And many choices are coerced due to religious patriarchal structures which are not actually true choices

In the same way that posts about kids donating their money to pay off others kids school lunch debt, or charities paying for cancer patients care are bad because they focus on the positive to that specific person instead of the shitty situation that causes them to be in that position in the first place, yes

No. People who don’t think sexist religious conservative values should be applauded. This is basically orphan crushing machine material

Also than*

This means, that there isn’t that much testing before the release. This can cause lots of problems for the end user.

Lol you’re buying into the FUD. ubuntu doesn’t test every possible combination of packages, nor do they test how updates actually impact the user. Generally updates are always good for users. They fix bugs. 99% of the time someone comes to a linux forum asking about an issue, the answer is “this was fixed in the latest kernel, try updating”. But because they’re using distros that use ancient, 3 year old kernels, they can’t.

Unless you have a staging computer where you stage your updates, you’re living in an illusion about “stability”, and using ancient tools with ancient bugs for no reason

Arch has an installer script now. It’s literally 1 command and you get a fully working system