Lyman said he was sleeping. He lied! He lied!
Lyman said he was sleeping. He lied! He lied!
Do we not credit artists here?
This is from Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal by Zach Weinersmith
Except Palworld isn’t what you described. It’s “build a base and capture mons and people to out to work at your base so you can climb the tech tree and build guns to fight the boss mons”.
And it’ll taste better because it isn’t a seltzer
To not offend America’s largest criminal gang
Be careful, police dogs are often abused trained into being more violent than they otherwise would be.
That’s why a lot of libraries let you check out ebooks and audiobooks through apps.
Properly funded libraries keep up with technology to better serve the community.
I do think that was the intent. All in the Family was progressive show for the time.
He’s called Archie Bunker in the States and a lot of older Americans (Boomers and Xers mostly) love him because he shares their views. They don’t get that that’s a bad thing and he’s shown to be wrong and backward on the show.
They do if they retcon things that happened in the good installments, like MSG4 explaining all the cool and unexplained stuff from the previous three by saying “nanomachines did it” except the one thing that would have made sense to be nanomachines, which turned out to be a case self-hypnosis.
Resurrections made money. Creativity matters not, number must go up.
And Rings of Power, which was also…less than great.
Maybe she’s the long lost heir to the Habsburg Dynasty?
This could also be “people who put stray carts (trolleys for UKians) in the cart return even if they weren’t the one to use them”
And from seeing many shoops in my time.
You’re correct, you have to find the settings (not near my pc but I think they’re in taskbar settings) after initial setup and you’ll see their “suggestions” until you do.
My backlog is large enough that I can wait to see how a game is when/if it reaches a 1.0 state before deciding to invest any time or money into it.
Regarding your last point: With the various engagement-increasing algorithms driving what information you actually see, it can be a challenge to see outside your own bubble. It takes active effort to not just see your own perspective reflected back at you and that’s by design.
A lot of people won’t engage with content they disagree with and engagement drives ad revenue so it behooves companies that only care about revenue to not challenge a user’s beliefs unless it’s something extreme enough for the user to engage out of rage and disgust (which is how chuds like Andrew Tate get promoted). It’s hard to see the otherside’s genuine viewpoint when it’s constantly filtered through the lens of your own side (or what the algorithm thinks your side is).
Stapling a survival crafter to a bad pokemon knockoff is not my idea of “fresh mechanics”.