I always neglected it because of its name. I thought it’s something for rust…

Important tool

Storage is cheap. You suggest combining the images and storing the difference.

You can’t separate the images anymore. You have to store them in a container such that you have one common base image. You can then later on decide which image to look at.

You could also take a short video and only display one image.

Avif uses a video compression algorithm, meaning it’s basically one frame of a video.

Btw, I wouldn’t care about your problem. Storage is cheap. Try saving 10 4k videos and you’ll laugh about your image library

You can use css. It’s not difficult

You can use Paperwm or other extensions for gnome to get a feel for it.

Nice. Althoigh it’s difficult to find a specific book via torrents, isn’t it?

Thx!

I don’t use tor much. I try accessing it using clearnet where idon’t have a working link currently.

Good to know that it’s still up although not accessible for me currently

How do you access it? I’ve got no working link

Not us. And worse the guy in charge loves edge and hates firefox.

Interesting how we live in different bubbles ✌️

By measuring dialogue, we have much more objective measure of gender inclusivity.

So what? What now? Does a book/ movie/story get better if it’s 50/50?

It’s nice to analyse data but what is it good for?

Now, you could rank the movies by popularity and draw the conclusion that the more men talk, the more popular the movie.

Correlation != causality

Let’s say I work in an IT area (but not infosec)

There may have been discussions around it beforehand. I didn’t ask why it went so smooth.

I don’t have to. Matrix is coming anyway. It’s not an if but a when.

For official (internal) company communication though I will advertise matrix instead of signal. I’ll report back once I’ve talked to the right people about it.

Thx!

I wasn’t able to debug it. Maybe next year or so

And a second in julia

I had problems with podman/selinux and jellyfin and gpu acvelleration which is why I’m on debian now. I’d go with atomic any day if I could solve the problem but I don’t know how.

The graph wants to highlight you and connect the data with you. You could’ve simply shown that we’ve produced this much in the past 30 years. It is even the same graph but another interpretation. It is the same. You corrected that 🥰

What I don’t like is that we always put time on the x axis. Always. There is no reason to put it on the y axis for this plot.

And then, you start 100 years ago where it was 5%, etc. And the data increases over time, instead of decreasing.

The title is misleading. It’s not in your lifetime. It means in the readers lifetime. The graph show’s you and not me. You updated that in your graph which is awesome 🥰

Wtf. Newpipe for the win

(Sorry apple users)