Didn’t islam have to have special religious scholars for figuring out tiny things?

At least in theory, Islam is traditionally adhered to as an all-encompassing lifestyle. As such, it’s unsurprising to find rulings on the minutia of affairs.

FWIW, deriving new religious verdicts and/or refining the old is a continuous effort as new issues/situations arise.

I feel like I remember them having to be called in to issue a special ruling through the Quran that a religious building could be entered temporarily by the police to end a siege between them and some other group.

Perhaps you are referring to issuing a so-called ‘fatwa’, which is basically understood as a religious ruling derived by an Islamic jurist on a (pressing) matter.

Apologies for my ignorance, but what’s OST?

I was under the impression Arch was more for “hardcore” users, is that an outdated mindset (or was it ever true)?

It’s more nuanced than that.

Arch Linux, the distro Garuda Linux is derived from, is definitely not a distro that holds your hand like e.g. Linux Mint does. It (somewhat) demands you to read extensively through its excellent^[1] ArchWiki.

However, Garuda and other derivatives^[2] are opinionated takes on Arch that try to fulfill a specific goal that its respective maintainers have in mind. This can range from using Arch Linux as a base for delivering:

• a scrutinizingly optimized distro that at (the very) least inches out every other distro in performance (i.e. CachyOS)
• a distro that functions as a glorified installer^[3] for Arch. But with that, remains very close in spirit to what Arch is all about (i.e. EndeavourOS)
• a ready-to-go gaming distro (i.e. Garuda Linux)
• (and everything in between and beyond…)

(Note that the oversimplified descriptions found above don’t quite do justice to the enormous effort that is put into these projects. Furthermore, it has to be mentioned that each of these distros proud themselves on the amazing communities they’ve built.)

Finally, it goes without saying that having an Arch base continues to pose a (potential) maintenance burden^[4] with the constant stream of updates. While some of the above distros include some of the available protections by default, none claim to provide a silver bullet^[5]. Thankfully, problems ‘should’ only act up every once in a while. And (almost surely) deflecting them with a working snapshot provides an evergreen magical experience.

So, to conclude, Arch Linux as a distro definitely is more demanding than e.g. Linux Mint. However, the derivatives mentioned above definitely bridge the gap to a remarkable extent. So much so, perhaps, that you might not even notice much of a difference (besides the constant stream of updates).

As the person in question has remained silent, I do wonder if I could perhaps help out instead. Would you be so kind to vocalize your question(s) as elaborate as possible? Afterwards, I’ll try to answer them to the best of my abilities.

I want my apps to be able to talk to each other. So flatpak is just in the way.

This is (at least somewhat of) a legit concern. But is mostly directed towards Flatpak’s limitations in its current implementation.

Also, I don’t see the point of immutable distros. I could boot off of btrfs snapshots years ago. Immutability gives me absolutely nothing of value either

Have you ever wondered why openSUSE started working on (what would eventually become) Aeon while they had previously pioneered the BTRFS + Snapper workflow with Tumbleweed? I believe you may find the point of immutable distros in there 😉.

If you’re still (relatively) new to Linux and are mostly interested in “just works”, then you simply can’t go wrong with systemd. It has (for better or worse) become the de facto standard on Linux and is therefore often assumed to be present. Hence, actively resisting it might be ‘costly’. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether it’s worth straying from the beaten path. Like, what do you hope to achieve?

As for the elephant in the room, what alternative can even put up a fight? While I’d be the first to admit that systemd’s design ethos leaves a lot to be desired; it’s so feature-rich that I’ve yet to find any distro that puts good use to (almost) all of them. But, including everything and the kitchen sink does make it hard for its competitors to compete whenever it matters; perhaps it’s one of the key reasons why systemd is as reliable as it is OR why attempting to replace systemd on Fedora/NixOS/openSUSE is a nonstarter. (Being founded and funded by Red Hat doesn’t hurt either. Nor does it hurt when its main developer is on Microsoft’s payroll.)

Though, even if I don’t see the likes of OpenRC/runit/sysvinit ever compete with systemd in terms of capabilities, I am cautiously optimistic for dinit and s6.

LOL, who am I kidding, systemd will (probably) only be dethroned whenever its PipeWire/Wayland is introduced.

What is the kernel version on your system? On both Linux Mint and Ubuntu*

Penguins-eggs to the rescue.

Your reply is much appreciated, fam! Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to return right away. I thank you for your patience! Btw, I’m not native. So, if I misuse any terms/words/phrases or whatnot; my apologies. Usually, I put in some significant effort to alleviate this. Sadly, I didn’t quite have the chance to do so this time. Thank you for your understanding!

Firstly, I’m glad we can have a civil discourse on this topic rather than resorting to personal attacks and namecalling. I also appreciate the fact that you seem like someone who actually wants to get to the truth rather than defending your stance no matter what.

Thanks fam for the compliments! Your engagement is (I think) (at least) equally commendable!

You’re right. The people in the video are in fact publicly celebrating the 9/11 attacks which took the lives of thousands of innocent people. As you can see, it’s not just grown ass men who are celebrating, but children and women too. If this is the level of hatred they have towards the United States, do I really need to explain how severe their hatred for Israel would be?

Btw, I understood the implied context of the footage. But, it would be intellectually dishonest if I didn’t take into account the framing at hand. Cuz, if we were to be very critical of the footage itself (so without AP’s provided text as guidance), then there’s nothing explicitly there that connects those celebrations to the 9/11 killings; no burning of American flags or anything that would imply it. Granted, I assume neither of us speak Arabic. So that doesn’t help either 😅.

Just to be clear, I’m well aware that this story is pretty much uncontested^[1]. So I’m not actually disputing it. But, with the benefit of hindsight^[2], it’s hard to completely deny any ulterior motives for broadcasting said celebrations.

And to push back: is it sociologically-speaking strange for them to be glad that the biggest support of their rivals has received a retribution?

That’s an easy question to answer. There would be one country and it would be called Palestine.

History has indeed taught us that that^[3]’s a pretty likely outcome. But, I was also curious to hear your take on the other question. Namely, “What would become of the Israeli people?”.

But they will be celebrating.

Likely indeed.

And they will want the whole world to see them celebrating. That’s for sure.

For this, I’m not so sure. But it could be.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolphinarium_discotheque_bombing#Aftermath

Ah, another celebration. I’m starting to notice a pattern :P .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWOw7YI7vzo

Another one.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xPNTbtUHVc

This video I didn’t pay a lot of attention to as the media outlet didn’t seem to be as reliable as I’d like.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-wyW-7iJwU

I think I got the message by now :P .

Again I want to be very clear that I’m not an Israeli sympathizer. I’m just trying to make a point that the Palestinians aren’t the saints that the liberals (btw I’m a liberal myself) often portray them to be.

If sainthood is achieved through suffering alone, then I’d argue they would make a good chance. But yeah, I get where you’re hinting at.

Thank you for providing that video!

I hadn’t seen it before, and I can definitely understand why its content is disturbing.

Granted, as I’m unable to understand the context beyond what AP themselves have provided, I’ll (for the sake of the argument) accept this as Palestinians celebrating an attack on the US.

Then, my initial intention was to dissect the argument and explain why I can’t agree with your extrapolation^[1]. However, to my surprise, your extrapolation might not be as far-fetched as I initially thought 😅. But, this ultimately depends on what you mean precisely. So, please allow me to ask further clarifications:

• With “Israel would simply not exist on the map today.”, what do you mean exactly? Like, what would come in its place? What would become of the Israeli people?
• With “And the Palestinians would be openly celebrating over the dead bodies of Israeli people.”, do you mean something similar like we see on the footage? Or something more grandiose? (And perhaps more sinister?)

Let me know if you still aren’t convinced.

Please allow me to take you up on that offer 😜.

they’ve been apparently working on its replacement for quite some time, so the “news” of its retirement actually comes because of the discovery of its replacement and the chatter around it.

Are you referring to the combination of Agama, Ansible and Cockpit?

Thanks for posting.

It has been my pleasure!

I was worried that it might have been forgotten about

The XZ utils supply chain attack has actually made the community more wary of blobs. Some projects were even prompted to come clean on this matter.

Fedora has also recently made a push towards reproducible builds. In the lwn.net article that discussed that push, one of Fedora’s spokespeople explicitly said that it would help combat supply chain attacks.

So, all in all, I can confidently say that it did leave a mark on the Linux landscape. Hopefully, this specific attack vector will not be as viable in the foreseeable future.

But if Palestine had the kind of military backing Israel does, Israel would simply not exist on the map today. And the Palestinians would be openly celebrating over the dead bodies of Israeli people.

What is this based on? Like, could you (by any means) back up this claim?

Please correct me if I’m wrong, but my understanding is that we didn’t get any alternative in return. Right?

thanks, that’s comprehensive

Thanks fam for the appreciation!

I recommend it at least :-)

I totally get it and I actually appreciate your efforts. Which shouldn’t be surprising as I favor anything ‘atomic’ over the traditional model. Heck, were it not for Fedora Atomic, I would probably have daily-driven openSUSE Aeon instead.

Uhmm…, my apologies for sidestepping to a topic I would rather not… But here goes nothing…

Perhaps you might have noticed the discussion that has been going on elsewhere in this thread😅. And thus…, you might have become aware that an LLM was used (by me) for wording/phrasing/punctuation the earlier ‘info-dump’. Note that the content is still mine. I just wasn’t able to commit to put out a decent writing myself. Instead, I speech-to-texted my input. Asked the LLM to make it legible. After which we had a bit of back-and-forth until we arrived at the final result.

Anyhow, now that you’re aware of the context, I would like to ask you the following: What would you have preferred?

• (Either) That I didn’t do any of that and thus not comment at all.
• (Or, rather) Our current situation in which I did whatever I did.

Would you want a piece of good faith, sincere advice?

Sure, fam. Hit me.

If not I can drop things.

Though, this confuses me… *confused* 🤔 Would you only drop them if I didn’t want it? For now, I’ll assume that’s just a typo (or something/whatsoever).

Strictly speaking, for my posts^[1] (i.e. my comments aren’t included into the conversation yet), I do heavily employ an LLM as a writing assistant. But the process those undergo is very different from the comment you see above; it takes a lot of time, effort and many revisions until I land on something I like.

As for my comments, it depends: if it’s longer, I employ it to help with shortening while retaining the content I meant to convey. Or, to help with wording/phrasing specific troublesome passages that either don’t flow well or if I’m unsure if idioms (and whatnot) have been used correctly.

While I don’t like to bring it up, some people -naturally- have the tendency to write up texts that are (somehow) reminiscent to what we’d expect from an AI. FWIW, I have many times been accused of this while the text was all just me…

Finally, to directly address the comment found above: No; I don’t think I can recall any other comment that was as carelessly composed as that one. And to directly answer your following question:

Do you always have ideas in the middle of the night and want to post them only to have an RSI flare up and no laptop nearby and decide to use ChatGPT to write your posts?

Nope. I can’t recall the last time -prior to the one above- in which I did something similar. And, again, content-wise, it is me. The LLM mostly just made it legible.

In this case, I woke up in the middle of the night. I couldn’t sleep. Saw this and wanted to answer somehow. Went to use speech to text for a first draft, you may find it below. As I’ve got pains related to RSI, however, I couldn’t be bothered to make it all slick and crisp myself on a phone. My laptop + split-keyboard setup was tucked in my bag. So, at that moment, I asked an LLM -unsure at the moment if it was trained by my own data to replicate my style of writing- to perform the ‘act’. After some back and forth, we got to the final result. Content-wise, I’d say, it’s all just me. The LLM only did wording/phrasing/formatting etc.

(The original draft from speech to text:)

Due to the order of how events have happened, i.e. the fact that Fedora Atomic matured earlier, simply by virtue of being earlier into development, and also because the idea to make a desktop out of it wasn’t just an idea that was tagged along later, but an important thing a lot earlier into its development These are definitely key reasons for why the adoption of Fedora Atomic has been a lot better than OpenSUSE micro OSes And I haven’t even mentioned the fact that a fan project like Universal Blue has had for the adoption of the ladder Heck, it’s easy to sum up in retrospect, simply because the data is there, that Universal Blue has single-handedly, maybe tripled or quadrupled the userbase of Fedora Atomic, hence all of the above has helped Fedora Atomic’s adoption a great lot Of course, Fedora is, for some reason, more popular than OpenSUSE, while they are mostly just different continental ideas, or distros, rather of the same idea, or close enough Regardless, as to your question regarding OpenSUSE micro OS, I think that with the way they’ve set it up It is relatively mild, at least at this point in time, to managed-ness

and abiding to the rules of congruent system management which means that if someone likes what Federal Atomic does in this regard as it is, at least in this point in time, by far the most popular of the Atomic branch of together with NixOS they often switch between these i.e. if NixOS is just too hardcore or its language is just a little bit obtuse for what they want out of the system then its easy for them to just simply adopt Federal Atomic instead or if they like Federal Atomic, what it is, but want to increase the level of managedness and going full declarative, then they can go for NixOS instead but having started from either of these, the unique selling point for OpenSUSE microOS Desktop is simply not there yet, or at least not as pronounced as it should be as for what I think, OpenSUSE microOS Desktop seems like a very logical step up from OpenSUSE Tomb Raid, which is probably how they envision the project at least if we would ask Richard Brown of course time will tell if the one will go over into the other or vice versa regardless, it is more interesting, in my opinion, as an evolution of the traditional model that adopts the most minimal of what atomicity and transaction updates has taught us

Rather than being a new paradigm in its entirety that tries to do or be as radically different as either Fedora Atomic or NixOS tries to be.

Removed by mod

Perhaps it was just placebo, but my system always felt snappier (even if momentarily) right after a reset. As such, it would slowly but surely reach a proverbial boiling point where starting fresh was the only thing that truly salvaged it for me. So yeah, while not exactly easy, it felt so gratifying that I couldn’t do anything but.

I had never heard of the impermanence module, that seems really cool !

It’s pretty great, isn’t it? And honestly, hearing folks get excited about it definitely nudges me closer to finally diving in this summer. Wish me luck!