Invoking snail biology is still a non-sequitur, regardless of the actual truth value of the initial statement
Invoking snail biology is still a non-sequitur, regardless of the actual truth value of the initial statement
“sexual identities” lmao way to anthropomorphize freaking mushrooms 🤣
They’re called mating types and are not at all comparable to the aforementioned, entirely human, concept
Fluorescence.
Awesome, let’s pump animals full of even more drugs by the billions for the sake of our own taste pleasure
Ceci n’est pas une figue.
I guess “microtubules create consciousness trough quantum gravity” is the Nobel loreate version of dementia
Don’t know what that means but it sounds freaking amazing
Lmaooo wasn’t me, or rather, seems to have been automatic
I’ve now removed the flag
I never actually read it as a dig at “elderly” scientists but I think you’re right haha
Tbf I think it’s supposed to be understood more conceptually as seeing how many things we take for granted as being outside the realms of possibility have just not yet been tackled the right way.
No worries Yeah, sounded like a mixture of abstruse and obtuse 😂
They’re using walking (region alpha) vs biking (region beta) region as an analogy: “paradoxically” you’ll reach some further distances earlier, based on your choice of mode of transport. Which wouldn’t work in my case cause I’ll take the bike to the grocery store down the street. At any rate, your “choice” of defense mechanism influences your rate of recovery, is what they’re trying to say
Damn, will I have to make another post?!
My favorite kind
Boy do I have a post for you!
I will steal this))
👌🏻
I can relate to the queasiness BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
Reminds me of this old 4chan greentext