Intergenerational wealth is a major determinant for an individual’s wealth.
Do you want to know more?
https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/akillewald/files/generations_of_advantage.pdf
Page 23 is the conclusion, start there.
Intergenerational wealth is a major determinant for an individual’s wealth.
Do you want to know more?
https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/akillewald/files/generations_of_advantage.pdf
Page 23 is the conclusion, start there.
How do I upload menu details for OSM? I couldn’t figure it out.
Don’t wrestle with pigs. You both get dirty, and the pig enjoys it.
Maybe the test says less about the tester, and more about the testee.
Yeah, this old guy is super generic and boring. /s
What if we just choose a role who decides what is and isn’t harassment? Just like how Minnesota chose a role that decides what books should be banned.
The way to avoid fascism is to keep power away from bigoted demagogues.
And there are no librarians that are bigoted demagogues?
You missed my point.
If a small committee can make the call, then that committee can be coerced for power. Especially if that committee gets little pay (in your words).
If you don’t want fascism, then you want to avoid consolidation of power.
Again, this sounds like a win on the surface, but I fear library staff being harassed.
content curation will be managed by “a licensed library media specialist, an individual with a master’s degree in library sciences or library and information sciences, or a professional librarian or person with extensive library collection management experience."
Cool, now we know who to bribe / influence / coerce. I don’t know if this is a win for at-risk groups.
dig a little deeper beyond what gets radio play and you can find some good shit.
Don’t leave us hanging! What are your suggestions?
This is why I never look up supporting evidence. I rather just stay in my ignorance. /s
If only I could be so grossly incandescent.
It’s rage bait, that’s why it’s spreading. Do your part, downvote and move on.
Believing claims on the grounds that they haven’t been disproven is just bad epistemology
Well, it’s a good thing that wasn’t my position.
If you’re claiming my fridge has no tiny invisible pink elephants you are welcome to provide evidence.
I will make no claims on the matter and thus have to provide no evidence either way.
Edit: I think you’re confusing me for the other guy.
what would be one more if I hadn’t already had a PSN account.
One more attack vector to gain access to all your other accounts across the internet.
Now, now, don’t be hasty. Sony can still screw it up somehow.
“There is enough evidence to be confident there aren’t structural problems” is what they’re really saying.
Bro, the graphite is not there. Everything is completely normal.
Negative claims require evidence.
Otherwise a safety engineer can go to a regulator and say “There are no structural issues with this building.” He is claiming there are no issues, he needs to back that up with evidence.
Your Jedi mind tricks won’t work on me. 😜
To be even more pedantic, isn’t it the impulse?