Dunno if you were aware, but there’s an easy tech you’re able to use to get actually good travel speed. Slide down a hill, any slight decline really, and jump into a glide. Slide momentum is maintained into the glide, and any glider will give high speeds. It’s the best way to explore by far.
If you understand the design philosophy of From’s games, you know why you’re wrong here. Have you ever even played their games? They all require you to be capable of knowing how to overcome obstacles and rise above a challenge. It’s on you, no one else. They’ve literally always been this way. Their games are wildly successful with or without your complaints for a damn good reason.
Dark Souls was beaten with voice input alone. I saw someone working on doing that with Elden Ring just the other day. This isn’t a disability issue. People just don’t like difficult games, and that is very much a skill issue.
You got a mouth, don’t you?
Sounds like you’re painting the world with broad strokes based on narrow circumstances. Not everyone is the 40yo you want to kick out, even if their situation seems similar. The OP is more than likely nowhere near 40 and obviously looking for ways to change their state in life. No reason to beat a stranger up because they resemble someone you know.
Edit: I just read more of the thread…the OP actually kinda sucks.
What’s your favorite?
Pass that along to their branding coordinators. No one here can do shit about what products are named.
I have dude wipes and a bidet. Fite me.
I love this!
One of my cats, Ito (named after Junji), has learned to be pretty clear in how he communicates. When he reeeeally wants pets and attention, he’ll stand up and reach a paw towards my face, miming a petting motion. When he wants me to override the automatic feeder and give him extra food, he’ll look me in the eyes, say something in cat (presumably “follow me”) and guide me to the food bowls, where he will then shower me with affection and try to convince me that he deserves a reward for being so sweet and adorable. I’m weak to his charms.
I think you’re right. But it can be worth it to try to change a mind.
I feel very silly for not realizing it could be my tone-deafedness making it hard to ask questions.
I’m addicted, man. And I got my friends hooked on the stuff. All I can do is sit with the shame.
The Tate boys. Or, dudes who peaked in highschool.
I’m pretty sure the downvotes are just men who don’t know any better (or less likely, users who passively despise tiktok). It wasn’t inflammatory or offensive, and it’s a coherent and brief video. Thanks for sharing.
Here’s the thing. You’re very right, it’s not deep at all. Metaphors, similies, analogies, hyperboles, implications, etc. are all very normal parts of human speech, and this meme is pretty surface level in its requirement to use these things.
However, something has dawned on me, and I feel it necessary to ask you: are you perhaps on the spectrum? We sometimes have difficulties not taking everything literally, and this causes a communication gap. If this is the case, I will be completely and totally clear for you.
We are not literally talking about a literal bear vs a literal man. This is in fact a real metaphor for “danger vs danger”. The literal interpretation is “men can be scary to many women”. Going further, respond to this point and don’t fixate on the hypothetical bear.
You didn’t read his response correctly, and your response comes off as nonsense because of this. Replace black with white, and the comparison is more accurate. Understand the dynamics between oppressor and the oppressed, and the different ways similar rhetorics are used to muddy the waters to create disingenuous conversations. “It’s sexist because women are saying men are scary” is a bad take.
My opinion, but I like Palworld more than any of the 3D Pokémon games since X/Y. It’s not really the same style of game when you really get into it, but the things that make Palworld different make it outright better to me. I don’t plan to buy Pokémon games at all anymore, and Palworld is a significant reason why not. It’s a little dismissive to suggest they aren’t a threat.