• Enter The Matrix [Ties Into The Matrix Resurrections]

• Avatar: Frontiers Of Pandora [Co-Exists With The Avatar Movies]

• Ghostbusters: The Video Game [Acts As A Sequel To Ghostbusters II]

• Marvel’s Spider-Man (2018) [Exists In The Spider-Verse]

• The Thing [Takes The Mystery Out Of The Movie’s Ending]

• Saw: The Video Game [Saw’s Creators Contributed To The Game]

• Mad Max [Introduced Furiosa’s Main Villain]

• The Lord Of The Rings Online [Expands The World Of Middle-Earth]

• Star Wars Jedi: Survivor [Part Of The Star Wars Timeline]

• Kingdom Hearts 3 [The Toy Story world is meant to take place before Toy Story 3 in the canon timeline of the movies.]

Some of these are a stretch, imo

I have the arranged in the order I use them most. Spoons are on the left, then forks, then knives. I rarely need knives while eating, just for cooking.

Reading the parahumans story, “Worm”, has changed how I look at people. It is my personal-favorite character study. There are dozens of characters who all have unique world views to explore.

Swinging between feeling like you’re a computer god, and then feeling like you’re horrible at your job.

I guess I didn’t mind the Mako’s handling as much as the big empty planets that felt like they were designed not to be driven in.

For Mass Effect, I gotta say I hate driving anywhere in the first game.

All for a game I picked up on sale for like $2 10 years ago

Just make sure you find and stick close to the other people at your job who think it’s funny.

Got it, thanks! I’ll play around with it this weekend.

Looks really cool! I’m going to ask what is probably a dumb question: how do I use this?

To quote the video this post is about, I often see this happen:

“wow, these rules are so robust!” followed by, “wow… these rules are so… robust.”

Pathfinder is neat, I play in three 2e campaigns. I prefer 5e, and that’s okay. Personally, I think the rules get in the way of the fun for pf2e. I still have fun, I would just have more fun in a less rule-heavy game.

I shy away from saying 5e is better, because I know many people who prefer pf2e, just like I and many others prefer 5e, or savage worlds, or shadow dark. Different games will attract different players, and sometimes those players who like different things play together. When this happens, compromise happens in order to play the same game. The hobby is better served by us looking for ways to compromise, rather than divide.

Yes, I agree. It does seem a little off base to leverage the ratio of good to bad feats as an advantage of the system though, when they both have good and bad feats in what seems like similar proportions.

As if most of the feats in pf2e aren’t? I enjoy pathfinder for what it is, and there definitely some things I like more than 5e. Pathfinder has more feats, and has more good feats, but also more underwhelming feats in my opinion. How many characters take abberation kinship?

The difference is that pf2e expexts you to have several feats by the time you’re even level 4, while 5e expects you to (optionally) have 1.

Cool, so I’ll wait to pick this game up until it’s $10 on a steam sale in 5 years, and play the community’s modded version.

Authentic fettuccine alfredo

Not at all, please read my comment again.

Good job. I have never felt the need to Google that since I never had a reason to question what I thought it meant.

Thanks for the recommendation!

I want to thank you for asking this question, and also explain why for the, “just google it” crowd.

I have believed for the last 10+ years that this meant combat-rpg. My ignorance would never have been fixed if someone hadn’t asked the question in a place like this; I never would have googled the answer to a question I didn’t have.

How many more serious questions out there would benefit from more discussion, rather than individual research?

Alright, take my soap box from me.

Hard agree. If the previous homeowner hadn’t put it in, I certainly wouldn’t have.