• 0 Posts
  • 5 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 3rd, 2023

help-circle


  • Seems like a redhat problem, so why is he complaining. It wasn’t the developer who signed an agreement to maintain xorg, so I don’t get the argument. Either you do it for the money you get paid, and if you don’t feel like it’s enough, then don’t do it. The developer can just quit and do something else, ask for another project. The only one who is making him work on xorg is redhat.

    But why even mention m it in the same context as Wayland, make Wayland work for the end user and 90% of people would not care if thier Linux machine was using Wayland or xorg.

    Yes I’ve had multiple issues with video conferencing on Wayland, but my experience is 1 - 2 years old. I just use what works, I don’t have any technical problems with xorg and that is why I use it.

    Just let xorg die.


  • MaximumPower@lemmy.worldtoLinux@lemmy.mlThe cost of maintaining Xorg
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    I honestly don’t get these posts, there’s a couple of things that is super weird.

    1. Why does every discussion about Wayland include trashing xorg?

    2. Isn’t the solution pretty obvious, stop mainting xorg if you don’t like to maintain xorg, who is forcing you to maintain xorg?

    I really don’t care if I’m using xorg or wayland, I just want something that works, and I have tried wayland and that isn’t the case as of the moment. And I don’t care about the why, because I can’t be like yeah I use Wayland that’s why I can’t be on this video conference.

    Just stop mainting it if you don’t want to maintain it, problem solved, move on.