I don’t know enough to be able to say how easy it is to take over, but having been done by a single person could mean that no one else has the skills or the interest to do it, or maybe to do it as well as the original person.
I can definitely see why it could make a Linux user worried.
That’s not obvious at all…
Maybe it is to people who are really deep into the Linux world but generally if there’s only a single person in the world doing something, it’s never obvious that someone else will start to do that if the first person stops.
Many people have speculated on the point of life but the way I see it the only universal point of life is to reproduce…
You can make your own human existence about whatever you want though.
To me it sounds like you could benefit from helping people locally. Seeing the news of things happening on the other side of the globe can make you feel helpless but if you help out locally by volunteering or some other way that makes sense to you, you can combat that feeling of helplessness.
Depends what “much” is but there can be a measurable difference if the distro comes with it’s own kernel, like cachyos.
Between different distros on the same kernel the difference in performance is negligible.
Doesn’t all immutable distros have updates that can’t be cancelled and that will either complete or not change anything?
I only just started learning about immutable distros so I may be completely wrong but it’s how I understand them to work when reading about it.
Isn’t that just their nomenclature for immutable?
What’s the difference between an atomic distro and an immutable one?
It’s it’s a command that is regularly used it should be baked into the gui somehow.
I’m close to 40 but help me out then.
What did you see that made you think he was a shill/tool? All I see is someone explaining why they don’t think a specific distro is good for beginners.
I need Hdr and vrr to work and a replacement for madvr that can make movies look as good as it can.
That’s what’s holding me, and multiple people I know, from moving to Linux.
The hdr and vrr seems to be about there but as far as I understand there’s still not an equivalent to madvr.
Why is that an easy block? The user you responded to was cordial, laid out his reasons and even provided some sources to corroborate. What exactly did he do wrong in your mind?
It seems like some distros have HDR working on most things.
I’ve been wanting to move from windows to Linux for about 10 years now but there’s always been something that Linux just didn’t do that stopped me.
I look into it every few years and now it seems like the only thing missing is the last few HDR hickups.
For a long time my issue with moving was that there was nothing on Linux that could compare to madvr. It seems like mpv is getting close.
Hopefully it’ll all get done before the support for windows 10 ends.
If video/audio playback and HDR is completely fixed before then I believe a lot of people will move to Linux rather than Windows 11.
That depends who you ask.
When you say it seems to have better HDR, is that deduced from watching the video or looking at these screen shots? Because if we’re talking about the screen shots I’d have to disagree.
Do you use a monitor with hdr and if so have you experienced issues with that?
Can you quote where that was said?
I’ve been following this debate for a bit and as far as I can tell it’s not so much that they’ll do what they can to keep rust out but more to make sure that the people who want to develop in rust are the ones who end up maintaining that part of the code and not the current maintainers.