But prison is so much more expensive… Looks at political donations from prison companies Ah - that’ll do it.
Why bother with representation and good policy when you can have corruption, graft, and all the wonders of late stage capitalism.
There we have it folks.
You couldn’t help putting a nice little bow on my point, could you?
You’re making highly authoritarian, essentialist arguments - I can’t imagine why you’d be getting that kind of pushback.
As you double down while getting downvoted to oblivion as everyone tells you how wrong you are, I’m sure you won’t be the…
kid (that) comes up with bullshit rationalisation for why they’re right and everyone else is wrong once they get home.
Die mad, I guess. Probably avoid having kids in the meantime though - I can’t imagine they’d deserve you as a parent.
I think you mean:
Wine is not an emulator ^is ^not ^an ^emulator ^^is ^^not ^^an ^^emulator ^^^is ^^^not ^^^an ^^^emulator ^^^^is ^^^^not ^^^^an ^^^^emulator ^^^^^is ^^^^^not ^^^^^an ^^^^^emulator ^^^^^^…
cedega
You know the best way to get a teenager or a toddler for that matter to do something? Start by treating them like a person.
I bet you absolutely love listening to people as they refuse to treat you like a person, let alone acknowledge your bullshit rationalisation.
Try not to lick any boots on your way out.
Into a deep frier?
Reminder that owning shit isn’t work, nor is selling access to housing supply that you’ve removed from circulation.
It’s also a hell of a lot easier than explaining your political position from first principles. There’s a good, simple reason we have and use labels - they’re useful.
They’ve also stolen code from emulators (who I think they also sued).
Common goals, with a strong unifying purpose for 1.
In no way reliant on a benevolent dictator, and using authoritarianism to push a purpose generally results in outcomes like genocide and the annexation of neighbouring territories.
Opportunities for significant advancement.
The opposite is typically true as autocratic leaders use their power to entrench their power, enforcing strong hierarchies.
Significant investment into medical care.
This one is a mixed bag, but also isn’t remotely dependent on an autocrat.
Strong leadership direction.
That needs to point in a positive direction for it to be a positive - something that’s almost never happened for long
An extremely egalitarian society.
The opposite is almost invariably the case - preferential treatment (generally paired with bloodshed) is necessary to keep the powerful in power.
Filtering of those in power.
Who filters the dictator? That would mean they’re not a dictator.
A “benevolent dictator” funnelling public funds and lives into an offensive war effort to keep the populace unified in hate sounds, and is meant to sound hellish. It’s an unnecessary waste of resources and lives that comes at the direct expense of providing for your people.
What are the advantages?
Oh cool - how does it know?
Hunter2
But he’s not in a car wearing speed dealer sunnies…?
I was - I watched the Jodorowsi doco a while back and mixed it in with the Lynch version - thanks!
It’s also that Disney own almost all the known IP, and will roll it out time and again as a safe bet with predictable returns - art by focus group simply isn’t a thing.
Capitalism, baybee!
Jodorowsi’s Lynch’s Dune was great in its own fever dream kinda way - don’t get me wrong, I’m over the moon we have the new movie, and prefer part 1, but the older movies are a thing.
Who will pay their
bribes to secure a healthy pipeline of human suffering because that’s good for their investorsdonations to encourage more great policies and responsible governance.