I vote for naming this branch “mommy”, since all other branches are it’s offspring, and related to it.

I mean, you can simply define something differently than the last 50 years of researchers in computer science. It’s just not going to make a difference.

I’ve developed “AI” using prolog.

No machine learning, you’re still solving problems using logical reasoning and deduction that’s not intuitively obvious for humans.

Machine learning isn’t the only form of AI.

This type of subscription is actually kiiiiinda understandable because the company has to maintain servers, staff and keep the software secure because they’re handling sensitive data such as location etc.

I also remember that BMW I think? Had a heated seat subscription and that’s really not justifiable imo

May I interest you in firefly III?

deleted by creator

From what I understand you obfuscate the port in order to limit the amount of incoming attacks. But then fail2ban would be a much more effective tool.

The disinterested aspect you described is the actual problem. Because it’s based on the assumption your port won’t be found, but it definitely will, and as soon as that happens you’ll end up in a database such as shodan and the entire effect is GONE.

Obfuscation is not security, changing the port doesn’t increase your security

I wouldn’t be overly harsh.

Some logos/images/designs are simply hardwired to the function that they can’t remember where the apps are if the logo changes. I’m pretty sure I’ll be the same if I use something for 30 years.

More like, how to survive without the required psychopathic tendencies.

Explain

So you can see 17% oxygen

Yeah I mean that’s a fundamental problem.

We can a) trust people/companies as long as they don’t give us a reason to not trust them.

Or b) we can never trust anyone but then this discussion is pointless anyway.

That is absolutely not correct.

Steam policy is if valve shuts it down, they’ll give you enough time to download all the games and run them without drm.

Well especially if the previous comment asked “or am I missing something”.

Obviously I could be wrong that’s why I said I THINK

You’re just going to shift goalposts every time I’ll post something.

Not recent enough. Not enough cases. That’s different.

And lastly you’ll just claim I do it because I’m an arch maximalist, despite not knowing anything about me :)

Exactly, why would they even put napkins out if the customers still come.

Yeah you’re missing the point that the mind blown is just ironic.

The entire point here was to demonstrate that the “security” features of these DEs are not implemented by the DE but by the underlying components such as PAM, and you can just ignore the DE until you have the basics fixed.

What’s the point in having a super duper secure login screen if I can bypass it by booting from a USB stick for example.