• 1 Post
  • 33 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle
  • Sorry, yes I was slightly unclear in my response. (I’ve moved the paragraph to make it clearer)

    The House of Lords in the UK is a mix of hereditary and life time peers nominated by the govt.

    The House of Lords has limited powers (I think can veto or suggest amendments to a bill only once before the house of commons can force it through) and it is a archaic institution that we have kept, I guess it adds an extra check or balance to the elected representatives.


  • Thanks for the explanation.

    Well gosh, I’ve had to go and read up on it too 😀

    Looks like we both have the same 3 branches, but I was wrong in thinking the house of commons and lords were 2 of those branches.

    In a perhaps slightly simplistic overview:

    • Legislative - debates and decides the laws.

    • Executive - executes or implements these laws in policy decisions (assigning funds to public bodies etc, setting mission statements)

    • Judicial - interprets the implementation of laws when needed (e.g. edge cases)

    Executive, Legislature and Judiciary. In the UK, the executive comprises the Crown and the Government, including the Prime Minister and Cabinet ministers. The legislature; Parliament, comprises the Crown, the House of Commons and the House of Lords.

    Also seems like the UK independence of legislature and executive branch is up to debate -https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_powers_in_the_United_Kingdom


  • I’m British, but it’s hard not to be aware of American stuff due to Reddit / Lemmy, movies, books, games, etc.

    Are the 3 branches of govt.:

    House of representatives, Senate, and judiciary?

    We have house of commons, house of lords, and judiciary. First is elected, second is a mix of hereditary and nominated by govt I believe. Third is appointed by govt I guess.

    Edit: looks like I got the branches wrong, see next reply.










  • I think that’s a good idea, my solution is to mute group chats and check them when I’m free, but it’s not ideal for the reasons you’ve mentioned.

    In whatsapp there’s only the option to mute the chat.

    In discord there’s granular level of control that allows me to mute everything but direct notifications (@d00ery).

    But if you implemented such a feature, how would you limit it?

    i.e. one notification for the first message and then mute all replies for 5 mins? What happens when that one person who always replies an hour later messages?

    Could we use AI to check if the conversation is still related to the original message?

    From a dev perspective there’s all sorts of solutions but I wonder how would one find the sweet spot.









  • Pi4 with 2TB SSD running:

    • Portainer
    • Calibre
    • qBittorrent
    • Kodi

    HDMI cable straight to the living room Smart TV (which is not connected to the internet).

    Other devices access media (TV shows, movies, books, comics, audiobooks) using VLC DLNA. Except for e-readers which just use the Calibre web UI.

    Main router is flashed with OpenWrt and running DNS adblocker. Ethernet running to 2nd router upstairs and to main PC. Small WiFi repeater with ethernet in the basement. It’s not a huge house, but it does have old thick walls which are terrible for WiFi propogation.