• 1 Post
  • 26 Comments
Joined 12 days ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2024

help-circle

  • If you want to protect your privacy against viewers of your videos, how you upload them to YouTube makes more or less no difference. With this scenario the question is how much information are you leaking in your content, and that’d cover everything from writing style idiosyncracies to anything that can be used to potentially identify eg. where you live and so on.

    If you’re worried about “malicious hackers”, then the question is who are these potential hackers you’re protecting against? Would they be attacking Google or you? If it’s you, then how you upload things to YT is again completely meaningless. If they’re attacking Google and get far enough to actually exfil data, what they’d actually be able to get out of it is anybody’s guess. Using a VPN and a throwaway email is probably good enough in any case.


  • dactylotheca@suppo.fitoPrivacy@lemmy.mlhow to post YouTube videos anonymously?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Who are you protecting your privacy against here?

    Because if it’s Google, then why on earth would you want to upload content to YouTube in the first place?

    OK, let’s say you didn’t give them your phone number and masked your voice. If you’re not connecting over a VPN or something like Tor, they still have your IP address.

    OK, you now use a VPN, but your browser can still be very effectively fingerprinted and that fingerprint could be nearly unique.

    And so on and so on. And this isn’t even going into metadata in & about your video files that could be used to fingerprint the system they were done on.









  • dactylotheca@suppo.fitomemes@lemmy.worldAI bell curve
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yeah that’s totally understandable. It’s just so scummy that suits know they can fire people for some idiotic whim like the current “AI” craze, and then when it inevitably blows up in their faces they can rehire the folks they just fired and for no extra cost because they know people will be desperate. Small wonder they didn’t cut your pay.






  • Yeeeaaah you’re supposed to regularly test that you can actually restore your backups, because boy do a lot of companies find out they can’t only after shit goes sideways and to their horror they then realize that they can’t restore some system’s backups because reasons.

    Not sure I’ve worked in a company that did that, and frankly even when I was CTO in a startup we didn’t have automated backup tests – mostly because it was still early days and I just manually tested restoring our in-house service when a change was made that would warrant it. N + 1 other things to do besides automating backup tests so I deemed that Good Enough™.






  • That said, it’s wonderfully cathartic.

    Right‽ This was seriously the best rant I’ve read in ages; not only was it spot on, it was fucking hilarious.

    This has to be the best way I’ve seen anyone describe what the problem with the current AI woo-woo is:

    And then some absolute son of a bitch created ChatGPT, and now look at us. Look at us, resplendent in our pauper’s robes, stitched from corpulent greed and breathless credulity, spending half of the planet’s engineering efforts to add chatbot support to every application under the sun when half of the industry hasn’t worked out how to test database backups regularly. This is why I have to visit untold violence upon the next moron to propose that AI is the future of the business - not because this is impossible in principle, but because they are now indistinguishable from a hundred million willful fucking idiots.