What does “chunking requests down” mean?

In my experience about 1 percent of suggestions are of that quality, and that’s only for snippets of a few lines of code at most. It almost certainly wastes more time than it saves.

And then there’s Norway.

There were a lot of dog sized dinos and nobody cares about them, which means you’re right!

We’ve proved the popular religions wrong definitively, but the truth’s turned out to be unbearably horrifying for most people.

We’ve got way more figured out than what religious people think.

Faith is the rejection of the possibility of producing a hypothesis.

On the flip side, it was just kind-a ok to be racist at that time. I can remember serious discussion on whether a black man could be smart enough to play quarterback in the NFL.

Depends on how its programmed.

This only works once a year, but the ice cream aisle on Valentines Day.

The greatest killer shockwave ever written

There isn’t enough information to get 80 minutes.

The lesson I’ve learned is keep out True’s reach

Don’t worry, they died naked.

Yes, in a month the linux share will be above 10000% of steam users.

Maybe AI will boost open source development more than commercial development since open source devs don’t have the privacy concerns.

How about a kind of Pascal’s wager for science?

Either the axioms of science are correct, or reality isn’t empirically testable. In the latter case, believing in the the truth won’t get you any farther than a false belief in science.

If Homo Sapiens don’t always suffer consistent illusions that leaves open the possibility they sometimes perceive reality more or less correctly.

Also, if there were no possibility of some “veridical perception” there would be no way to gather evidence that some perception is illusory. That’s a good place to look. Demonstrations of consistent illusion must include some new mode of perception that reason dictates is closer to reality.

“And even so, we do have empirical evidence that homo sapiens”

You’re trying to have it both ways by equating “homo sapiens [at times] don’t suffer consistent illusions”, which is obviously true since we don’t all have the same experiences, and “homo sapiens [never suffer] consistent illusions” which is equally obviously false because of the evidence you alluded to in the second part.

but why would you want to?

ublock does a good job of blocking ad block blockers at least on major sites.