That’s fine. There will always be some niche / industrial software that someone needs Windows for.

Yeah.

There’s waaay worse things you can catch.

There’s a huge variety in condiments.

Mayo is egg, vinegar, and oil.

Fats (oil) are super complicated. Some are very bad for you like canola oil (but they’re also cheap) while some are very good for you like olive oil (EVOO) (but it’s very expensive).

Some Mayo varieties will have these three ingredients and an emulsifier to help it stay nice on the shelf.

Others will have heaps of sugar and bullshit flavours.

The difference in nutritional value is huge.

OP’s reply to this comment.

You’ve seen the headlines about telsa sales tanking right? In some markets by 50% or 60%. That’s a big deal.

First movers do enjoy a special privilege but I’m not sure how sticky that will be in this case. Musk’s political views are at odds with people that are environmentally conscious.

Those views are now indefeasible from the brand and this kind of “vandalism” (provided it doesn’t significantly damage the vehicle) is a great way to reinforce that connection.

OP is including writing “wash me” in the dust on the rear window in “vandalism”.

That doesn’t financially harm anyone and is obviously not the same as burning someone’s house down.

Vandalising a telsa directly harms musk financially.

Yeah. You see it all the time around here. It’s usually some smart ass kid doing it to their mum’s car or whatever.

However, that’s still “vandalism” by your definition.

Just gonna be honest… you seem a bit uptight about this.

If you define “vandalism” to include “writing in dust” then yes, some types of “vandalism” are ok on any type of vehicle what so ever.

Sometimes people write “wash me” in the dust on someone’s window. Who cares.

It’s not “too hard”, it just completely unreasonable to expect people in general to self host as a way to “fight against tech billionaires”.

I can assure you that most people would find the amount of effort required to learn, implement, and maintain self hosted services to be unpractical.

I don’t “get you” because your argument is non-sensical.

You’re saying that you want a legal system where everyone receives the same treatment but then in the same breath arguing that an exception should be made for Luigi because Trump hasn’t been punished.

I’m not really sure what you’re getting at?

I’ve been self hosting for many years. Including mission critical data for my consultancy.

It’s a great hobby and I’d encourage anyone who’s interested to get involved.

That said, for people looking for a way to “fight against tech billionaires”, migrating their google drive to a self hosted nextcloud instance from a cold start with no experience in self hosting is inadvisable.

It may not be “hard”, yet it’s just not practically possible for most people.

Not sure if this is really accessible for everyone.

It’s probably easy to underestimate how difficult setting up and managing services can be.

However you feel is not “wrong”, and in this case pretty understandable.

Here in Australia I don’t have a problem with the flag itself, but there seems to be a strong correlation with people putting flags on their cars and being racist assholes.

Yeah this is me. It’s been just perfect for many years now.

If only there were some way you could kind of refer viewers to the primary documentation for the project.

It’s not that it’s uncommon, but slightly different for each project.

I collated library would be kinda cool.

That said, I don’t know how much utility this project would have.

you ‘equally’ refuse to allow the punishment of defendant by returning a ‘not guilty’ verdict

That’s not what equally means. The same law needs to be applied to everyone. Making exceptions creates inequality.

Luigi was acting in self defense

If that is Luigi’s legal defense then the jury needs to weigh the evidence of that claim and if supported of course they would return a not-guilty verdict. That’s not jury nullification.

‘not guilty’, regardless of the letter of the law.

This is, quite obviously, a corruption of the legal process. If jury nullification is an intended feature of the legal process then why aren’t jurors instructed to find the defendant guilty, not-guilty, or exempt? Why don’t defense attorneys tell jury’s that the application of the law in this case is unjust and therefore they should find the defendant not guilty?

Your fixation with DeSiGnInG RoBuSt sYsTeMs is absurd. It doesn’t support your position in any way. I could just as well say that you obviously don’t have a job that requires much thought or requires you to consider complex problems with unquantifiable ethical aspects.

You thinking about this for a long time also does not support your position in any way. People can believe in all sorts of nonsense their entire lives. The inflexibility and inability to support your position is a pretty good indicator that you haven’t really thought about this but merely like how the concept feels.

If you actually read the wiki page, you will find it supports everything I’ve said.