• 0 Posts
  • 165 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 27th, 2025

help-circle
  • It’s kind of annoying that this guy assumes pixel snapping is always a problem and never an intentional aesthetic choice. As if the devs of Blasphemous and the other titles he names either weren’t aware of it or couldn’t figure out how to get rid of it. Really though, this is a fairly basic, generally early consideration in any pixel art game with a free-floating camera, and I can guarantee you that the devs of Blasphemous preserved pixel snapping intentionally for one reason or another. It could even have been the case that the background layers didn’t look as good if pixels of one layer were peeking halfway out from behind a layer in front of them, and so the devs might have even enforced pixel snapping to preserve layer alignment. For many devs making pixel art games the artistic constraints generate much of the inspiration, and pixel snapping is one such constraint.











  • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.nettoCommunism@lemmy.mlProtestation
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    No I say up to the end of medieval times because shortly thereafter (After a brief 30-year kerfuffle) is when we see the first emergence of what we’d recognize today as nation states. Though I do not refer only to debt cancellations that go by that specific name, “jubilee” is just what we often refer to it in the west. It was done to varying degrees in many ancient cultures.

    Around 1300 the church kind of coopted “jubilee” as being a bulk forgiveness of sin rather than financial debt (I think the Catholic Church did one as recently as 2000). But traditions like May Day and various festivals of fools kept the spirit of social inversion and and anti-hierarchy alive since then. We still practice echoes of those traditions today in things like April Fool’s, “opposite day”, our current labor-centric May Day, etc.


  • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.nettoCommunism@lemmy.mlProtestation
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    From the beginning of civilization all the way up to the end of medieval times, leaders understood the importance of jubilees: Every generation or so the concentration of wealth under a hierarchy gets so bad, so unbearable, that debt must be relieved across society by decree to prevent open revolt.

    Nation states were the end of all that. The merchants (Today we call them capitalists) are not the figureheads of society the same way that kings were, they don’t fear for their lives when they order politicians to double down on debt, issue new currency endlessly if they must, force through any economic hardships in order to prevent the relief of worsening inequality, to prevent the endless accrual of their wealth and lifestyles.

    Instead of relief every 50-odd years, we’ve been hurting more and more for the past several hundred because nation states provide a faceless, unassailable aegis for the top heirarchs that never existed for them before in history.






  • To use your logic, you don’t get to decide how I interpret the responses to my comment.

    That’s correct. So if you felt like others were taking your words too seriously, then say that. Without the reflection at yourself, in the English language you’re telling others how they should be feeling rather than saying how you feel. I hope a grammar misunderstanding is all that really was.

    And for the record, I do regret coming on so strong. I’ve been stressed today and this is not the first time in the past 24 hours I’ve realized too late that I could have been more diplomatic. So, sorry about that.



  • This is kind of the core question of disability, I think. What is disability if not a mismatch between your own way of navigating and functioning vs assumed normativity? If your own way of navigating and functioning was the assumed normative mode, would you still be “disabled”? A lot of our societys normative behaviors can in some way be hindering to those exhibiting them, but society is ready to provide full support to compensate for such things as they are a part of the normative mode. It’s a fun thought experiment to consider how difficult it might be for a more or less normative person to function in an autistic society that only recognized and provided for normative brains to the degree that our own society provides for autistic brains. And on that note - Would an autistic society be better at providing for those people than ours does for us? Or would we close ranks around a new normativity the way that our own too often does?