This is why Gwen Stacy’s death was so confusing to some people
This is why Gwen Stacy’s death was so confusing to some people
Replying again to say: that actually makes sense. You should have said that upfront! Suddenly being locked out of critical software is definitely a risk worth considering
Why?
It’s more about scale. Small open source projects might get one PR a month. Your average tech company is dealing with dozens of PR every single day. Review fatigue is real in these environments
They didn’t like being called birds. They felt they were being pigeon holed
He had an interview with Google and they asked him to invert a binary tree, which is essentially taking a tree of data and swapping the positions of all sibling nodes.
While most people agreed it was a pretty pointless question to ask at an interview, mxcl had a full “don’t you know who I am” shit fit on social media.
If anyone hasn’t made the connection, mxcl is the infamous Google interview binary tree guy
Now listen here you little shit
This is whataboutism of the most laborious kind.
nothing purrsonal kit
Comparing a car to a private jet regardless of passenger count is disingenuous in the extreme
Full of people… Who only need to be there because of her.
This is like arguing it’s more efficient to put wheels on your house and drive it to work every day
The duality of man
The duality of man
Well they haven’t mass murdered me so how can I be sure?
Do you have any samples of their design work?
I’m hot on this case.
Er, yeah, I agree with that. Nothing to do with my point, but you are correct.
It depends on your intent. If you’re doing it to keep history clean and linear in the long term, it’s a huge waste of time as it gets splatted into a single squashed merge commit. It also makes it difficult for reviewers to rereview your changes as GitHub/Lab can’t calculate the diff because you keep moving the goalposts with force pushes.
If you’re doing it for cleanliness on your local branch then I guess that’s fine, but I find it anti-social in a multi participant repo.
Sorry for a second comment but, by agenda, are you implying that I’m anti evolution?
The original comment I replied to made a definition of evolutionary success and I made a counter-definition. I’m not sure what conversation that you’re referring to before that. There was only one other comment above it in the chain and it had little do with defining the evolutionary success of chickens or what that might entail.
If you’re perceiving an agenda where there is none while also not understanding the point being made then, not to be rude, but thats a comprehension issue.
It’s possible I’m explaining it poorly, but I’ve run out of ways to approach this so I can’t offer you anything more.
Is that in the movie? This is the image I have in my mind but I forgot that she hit her head. I think that’s not the case in the comics IIRC. Instead it’s unclear whether her neck was already snapped before she fell, or the late web catch caused the snap.