• 2 Posts
  • 73 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: November 6th, 2024

help-circle
  • AI isn’t ready to replace just about anybody’s job, and probably never will be technically, economically or legally viable.

    That said, the c-suit class are certainly going to try. Not only do they dream of optimizing all human workers out of every workforce, they also desperately need to recoup as much of the sunk cost that they’ve collectively dumped into the technology.

    Take OpenAI for example, they lost something like $5,000,000,000 last year and are probably going to lose even more this year. Their entire business plan relies on at least selling people on the idea that AI will be able to replace human workers. The minute people realize that OpenAI isn’t going to conquer the world, and instead end up as just one of many players in the slop space, the entire bottom will fall out of the company and the AI bubble will burst.
















  • The problem, as I see it, is the abandonment of communities by moderators.

    For example, if I make a community community called “Baking”, never post anything, and then disappear off back to Reddit (or whatever) I’m basically polluting the namespace of my server with a dead-end community that has no hope of ever growing into something active. Sure someone could make “Baking2” or “RealBaking” or whatever, but that kind of sucks and is messy.


  • Sure, but the fact that you’re at least still active on Lemmy and paying attention makes it less of a problem.

    The ghost communities I’m really talking about are the ones where you click on the moderator’s profile and find that they don’t even seem to be active on Lemmy much at all anymore. At that point, those communities have zero chance of growing because they’ll quickly be unmoderated, and to my knowledge we have nothing like Reddit’s “subreddit request” in place where unmoderated communities can be taken over from absent moderators.

    Obviously not every community is going to be super active all the time, that’s not a problem. The problem are the communities on popular servers that have “reserved” good names, are inactive and effectively unmoderated. Those types of communities are only serving to pollute the namespace of the most popular servers, imo.





  • maplebar@lemmy.worldOPtoFediverse@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Herein lies a problem I’ve had for a while, actually. It’s hard to tell people about Lemmy, because “Lemmy” isn’t really a website, or an app, or even a platform, really. It’s a protocol that anybody can use. For instance, we’re not really posting comments here on Lemmy, as much as we are posting comments via Lemmy.

    Yeah… I agree.

    One problem is that the names of software projects like “Mastodon” and “Lemmy” get mixed in with the names of servers like “mastodon.social”, “mastodon.art”, “lemmy.world”, “lemmy.ml”, etc.

    That creates a lot of unnecessary confusion for potential new users, because they end up conflating the software with the server, thus missing the big idea of the fediverse completely: that a bunch of servers, even those running different software, can talk with each other to form one big social network.

    But it’s kind of a moot point because there probably isn’t much that can be done about that now.

    I just hope that in the future people will avoid using software names in their server branding, because it only confuses people.