🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕠𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖

Yeah and a majority of hands you shake have touched a dick.

I took your mother there last night. A real bargain

So an organised resistance of ice (the federal government) from carrying out their duty. On a scale large enough that the local police could not maintain the laws of the nation. Is that of sufficient scale and resistance?

Not sure how u are comparing deportation to death threats? Are u advocating for literally fighting the federal government with force? Cos if so that is by definition a rebellion or at a minimum of an attempted rebellion. You do realise by saying this you have met the requirements for the president to call in the national guard without the governors approval.

“10 U.S.C. 12406,” within Title 10 of the U.S. Code on Armed Services. It allows the president to deploy federal troops in instances of “a rebellion or danger of a rebellion” against the U.S. government.

U yourself just provided evidence to support the use of federal troops.

Sure that officer should probably be fired.

None thankfully. Probably because someone called in the national guard.

So ur advocating for breaking the law if u personally think the law is immortal?

Isn’t that exactly what the jan6 insurrectionists where doing?

Or are you the arbiter of morality and everyone else immoral?

Eat your cake or have it u can’t have both.

Maybe because last time when he didn’t there was an insurrection? Maybe he learned from last time?

We are talking about la here not his other activity.

Except their actions aren’t illegal. And what does accountable mean? Cos from what I’ve seen accountable means death threats to the individual and their families.

A riot and attempted rebellion. Trump wanted the nation guard their and was blocked by the local govner.

“10 U.S.C. 12406,” within Title 10 of the U.S. Code on Armed Services. It allows the president to deploy federal troops in instances of “a rebellion or danger of a rebellion” against the U.S. government. Doesn’t need an invasion just needs danger of a rebellion. Attempting to murder federal officers and attempting to directly subvert the will of the federal government is by definition a rebellious act.

Where has the supreme court ruled that this deployment is illegal? Can u point me to it please?

Did u read the part of my comment when I said in relation to la? The ironic thing is that jan6 was more peicful than what’s happening lol.

“10 U.S.C. 12406,” within Title 10 of the U.S. Code on Armed Services. It allows the president to deploy federal troops in instances of “a rebellion or danger of a rebellion” against the U.S. government. Doesn’t need an invasion just needs danger of a rebellion. Attempting to murder federal officers and attempting to directly subvert the will of the federal government is by definition a rebellious act.

Where has the supreme court ruled that this deployment is illegal? Can u point me to it please?

1. U have been misled. All people deported have already been issued with “final orders of removal” at which point the supreme court agrees you no longer have any right to due process. As that was forfeit when you failed to turn up to ur court appearance. Ie illegal immigrants where told hey ur here illegally come make ur case or ur getting deported. Said illegal immigrants then failed to show up at which point they where issued with “final orders of removal” most of these illegal immigrants where issued this years ago and have simply been illegally in the country ever since.

2. “10 U.S.C. 12406,” within Title 10 of the U.S. Code on Armed Services. It allows the president to deploy federal troops in instances of “a rebellion or danger of a rebellion” against the U.S. government. Doesn’t need an invasion just needs danger of a rebellion. Attempting to murder federal officers and attempting to directly subvert the will of the federal government is by definition a rebellious act.

Related to la what has he done that’s illegal?

That’s not a comparison you want made. Maybe life might be a bit harsh but they should all have gotten long sentences. Not to mention that the jan6 rioters where more peaceful than these rioters. Ohh and jan6 happened because trump didn’t/was blocked from calling in the national guard to protect the city. So ur right but this doesn’t help your case.

The execute bullshit is a legal power granted to the president. The brick throwing is literally assault with a deadly weapon I don’t see how u can justify that. It doesn’t matter what u think the president should be it matters what the laws of the country state that the president is. What laws are being broken in the case of la (well except the rioters)?

Ahh so all those instead girls who post their makeup are just doing it for the gaze of other people got it

The only people who have done anything illegal are the rioters. U might not like what trumps doing but it is entirely within the rule of law