• 4 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 31st, 2025

help-circle




  • P2P caught my interest because of the possibilities that opens up when you remove the middle-man/server (even better call quality, no file size limits). But it doesn’t have to be P2P - I’m just a fan of “local first”, decentralization and democratization of technology in general.

    I agree, we share the same sentiment about it. Unfortunatley I didn’t find anything p2p near as either centralized or decentralized(federated) services are. I do have hope there will be good infrastructure and apps that are fully p2p with no blockchain scams around them in the near future around 5 years.

    For now I think xmpp is the way to go. Here you have a list of servers, and there are plenty of clients avaiable. Clients: Web - inverse.chat, movim.eu (conversejs a framework to use xmpp on the web) Desktop - Gajim, Dino, Psi+ Android - Conversations (download from f-droid) <- this one is really good iOS - Monal

    Here you have more info. XMPP also has it’s own issues, for example metadata, different servers supporting different stuff, different client supporting different stuff but overall it is in a really usable state and stable. Just pick some servers that are not connected to companies or states.

    Also a thing about matrix which is, from what I see, more popular than xmpp, my guess is due to more marketing. In my opinion it shouldn’t be used nor should get any praise from privacy oriented people. Here is a good article going further.

    I’d try Tox out also, seems good. And it’s good to use those apps to normalize and boost p2p, by using them we are helping them in the long run. Also Signal is kinda good option, but it is centralized which is it’s biggest flaw. I think Signal did most of the work by popularizing e2e protocol which now everyone use and that they will stagnate in a centralized stage, becoming nearly commercial product.



  • If you can name alternatives with similar functionality made by people who are not affiliated with crypto, I’m all ears

    https://tox.chat/index.html maybe this, didn’t try it, but it says it has audio/video calls and file sharing.

    How strict are you on going with full p2p, because xmpp is federated(not p2p) and it has nice network of servers working a long time and ok clients to use, Conversations being the best imo. Some of my friends switched their family and friends to xmpp and complaints at all


  • Why would you use it anyway ? If you want p2p chat there are options not connected to any blockchain, briar for example.

    but if I don’t use it, where’s the harm?

    The harm is already made by making this application. By using it you help spread idea that p2p=blockchain/crypto which is not the case. It’s just that cryptobros coopt word “p2p” into their language and supposedly they are p2p.

    Same as you don’t have to use their micropayment, there is no reason to use this app also. There are real p2p options, as I said briar for example, or some other p2p chat app without cryptobros bullshit.


  • stm@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoPrivacy@lemmy.mlKeet and the potential of P2P technology
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Payments Built In As your app grows, Holepunch lets you evolve into a business without compromises. With Bitcoin Lightning and USDt micropayments built-in, it’s easy to implement and use powerful paid features in apps. Peers control their own data, including how it’s bought and sold. The days of tokens, ads, hidden incentives, and data harvesting are over.

    No thank you



  • Yes, but youtube has a network effect. Imo best option is to post on every network and favor federated ones. For example post first on peertube, couple days later on youtube. Or post part video on yt and full video on peertube.

    Things like that are more effective than just plainly ignoring big tech networks. And that would actually show and bring the people to the federated networks.


  • stm@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoAnarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.comHow Capitalism is Dying
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    We live in techno fuedalism

    We live in capitalism. Calling it any other than capitalism just provides and option for capitalism to avoid critique. For example one can say the issue is techno feudalism, not capitalism. While in fact it is capitalism all the way down.

    It’s simmilar when people use, this is “crony capitalism”, while it’s still just capitalism,








  • i doubt about that limit, think capitalism puts more limit on science now, i replied to some other comment in more details regarding this

    I mean it’s all speculation I guess.

    i agree, to achieve conditions to enable forming of free associations of workers first capitalism(capitalistic relations etc.) must be abolished which is hard thing to do already


  • Yes, science is complex, infrastructure is complex.

    i don’t see loosely connected groups being able to solve that issue

    these are not “loosely connected groups”, it’s not a group of friends doing a party, it’s a complete industry.

    thing is to change relations in production and to work according to needs and with solidarity towards each other and other communities. try to look at it as complete system, not just pinhole view at just scientists interested in particles or whatever scifi there is. that federated system would have to solve food, housing, medicine, education and through solving that and enabling others to work in fields they are interested in would in the end enable space travel, or whatever scifi other there is.

    i would say that within that system it would be easier to develop science and more pleasant and beneficial to society than in current capitalist one