it’s not social because everything is bots and ai slop /s

Some of the translations seem like order / suggestion for the formal singular “you”.

For tis topic I love the discussion of Rational Animations. Here is one of the videos of the topic:

Humanity was born way ahead of its time. The reason is grabby aliens.

We are living the plot from PsychoPass

Every corner of the world is in a way suffering from war, corruption, or civil unrest, not just “The West”

Firstly, do you mean only animals aren’t possessions? What about all other things and resources?

Secondly, are you saying people should do they best to keep consumption to a minimum, while surviving themselves? Does this mean we could let all animals die and stop existing because we have no use for them, or should we do our best to maintain biodiversity and life on this planet?

Immigration helps the common man by filling low level positions that most natives will not take. A lot of immigrants don’t know the local language and/or the local culture, so it is fair that they take free, unwanted jobs.

Further, there are a lot of protections for the workers, including immigrants, meaning wages and working conditions do not fall below acceptable standards. Immigrants strengthen the core pillars of industry, which might even lead to an increase in productivity and better conditions. They contribute to the economy and help pay public services which benefits the broader community.

What programming learning app do you use ? Why not use online information ? Why buy lifetime subscription ?

I am interested in joining this initiative. Also, in your manifesto, in footnotes

(4) “outweight” => “outweigh the”

(5) “memebers” => “members”

(7) “… but you might loose it …”, it should be “loose it” => “lose it”

(8) “freelly” => “freely”

tbf javascript is not a programming language, it is the language of the devil

isn’t nostr overrun with cryptobros?

Just because they are equivalent for the labguage does not mean they are interchangeable. I may choose to use single or double quotes in specific cases and need that change to be visible, even if the language rules say it is indifferent.

This is the obvious one: The way the string is written changes, but its content remains the same. There is nothing to highlight for SemanticDiff.

Moreover, my point was about how they phrase it. It seems they dismiss what the code means to developer by mentioning “content” and discarding “the way the string is written”.

Usually my models only store data, meaning the files that contain them don’t have much code. The decision also depends on the tools you are using and who you are working with. I would fallback to the rule of separation of responsabilities and write a new class for the purpuse of serializing the model (which could and should also serialize similiar models). This way is universal in any language and can easily be understood by future you and colleages.

The most obvious option: highlight what changed, the whole string. If you changed the string from interpolated to non-interpolated, the meaning of the whole string changed; it is no longer a method to concatenate variables, it has become a literal string.

Same for the example of single to double quotes. In some languages, double quotes are only used in specific contexts, so its use changes the meaning of the code. The post seems to dismiss this fact too easily.