it means that you have to manually reposition every single window, every single time. for any and all apps, by design
it means that you have to manually reposition every single window, every single time. for any and all apps, by design
more like "move glacially and declare things as "will not support’ so technically we had nothing TO fix!"
it’s when devs of a graphics stack just suddenly feel the need to protect your own computer from itself, so they say fuck you to any features that they deem “insecure”, including accessibility features (they will claim they fixed this, but it’s opt-in per app. old apps will just be completely unusable for some people with special needs.)
But they eliminated tearing on the desktop! woo!!!
change one pixel and suddenly it doesn’tmatch. Do the comparison based on similarity instead and now you’re back to false positives
true, but totally irrelevant. Gps has nothing to do with sim cards
so, you have gigabytesper second of disk io, and the game relies on the couple of megaBITS of internet bandwidth most people have to stream textures? As opposed to downloading and installing them once as an update…
This does not pass the smell test.
ever notice how most of them look like a rectangle and have glass on the front?
you have tegridy
control-z, kill %1
you mean it doesn’t work when the device is turned off? weird! /s
celsius or fahrenheit?
sometimes, a script needs to be edited in a plain text editor, without having access to an lsp or any other dev tools.
no, there hasn’t. What games called ai has nothing to do with the generative ai bullshit of today
3 monitors, any day. I already hate 16:9 over 4:3
99% chance to hit in xcom means you’ll accidentaely fill up the bathtub without a single drop hiting the actual toilet.
but they have a lot more disadvantages for most scenarios (if you’re not a faang scale company, you probably don’t need them)
by issues I mean breaking existing users’ workflow, possibly literally locking them out (I personally use a yubikey with my keepass db, for example).
There is a very simple solution he could have done: not rename the existing package. Just give his fork a new name. That’s it, everybody is happy.
So yes, he is the one causing issues. Because the issue isn’t in the features he removed, but by breaking the users’expectation that the package they installed yesterday, is the same one they’re updating today.
well it is that one person causing issues
when in need, cry out for mommy!
it’s opt-in, per app. Meaning unless old apps are patched and recompiled, they will be inaccessible.