This guy wants to be the main character so badly.

It will work with an LLM if the propagandist is trusting user input (tweets in this case). But any propagandist worth their salt is going to sanitize user input to prevent this sort of thing.

Naw, I think it probably promotes reproduction

I guess that makes work the opposite of racing.

Release them! Release them! 👏👏👏

I’m not even talking about political stuff. I’m talking about how people make all kinds of false assumptions about you and accuse you of things when you’re just trying to have a normal human conversation.

I’m not talking about users who make crazy comments. I’m talking about how I made a legitimate, on-topic, non-controversial post in good faith and it got removed with no explanation. Then when I followed the sub’s instructions about how to ask why my post disappeared, the mod replied with a bunch of passive aggressive snarky shit and muted me.

Genuine interest or just spezzing?

Phew, for a moment there I thought you were trying to take the gratuitous murder out of games

Blowing on it helps. The humidity in your breath reinvigorates the silicon.

1. Fear
2. Surprise
3. Ruthless efficiency
4. An almost fanatical devotion to the Pope
5. Nice red uniforms

The lack of a visual imagination that you can control is called aphantasia.

deleted by creator

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YbseBW-AWn4

Maybe it’s the people who are judgmental and intolerant of how others communicate (or don’t) who are wrong?

It’s completely impossible to prove, without making any assumptions, that anything other than one’s own mind exists. However, it’s also completely impractical not to assume one’s own perceptions are generally valid (them being invalid is the exception rather than the rule).

Belief in things seen (accepting the validity of perception) is fundamentally different than faith which is the belief in things unseen (equating imagination with perception). The former is necessary to function in the world. The latter is not necessary to function, even if some people derive value from it.

Edit: I probably should have said “a mind at a moment” rather than “one’s own mind”. But perhaps identity is a topic for another day.

Turns out there’s a bug in the client I’m using and it wasn’t showing the comment about anti-intellectualism. All the comments I could see were replies to that comment that I couldn’t see, so I assumed they were replies to OP.

I don’t understand why people think OP doesn’t know it’s satire.

My quantifier is so greedy for you right now

So be cringe and publicly wank