• hauiA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fusion is a great idea but renewables are still more democratic as they cont need to be very much “operared”. Fusion in comparison requires secure, high tech chambers with a fleet of engineers. In our current society, everything except renewables should be viewed with suspicion.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fusion (assuming we manage it) is the point where we move from energy scarcity, to energy surplus. Renewables might do this to, but it’s not as certain.

      That would change the world in profound ways. The current world powers would fade and a lot of solutions move from “too expensive” to “no brainer”.

    • dust_accelerator@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      While I fully agree, that focus should be on swapping out fossil fuel power generation with renewables and more/better storage, fusion will, if possible, be a very important part of the future of humans (if we make it that far).

      And of course it sounds really badass “harnessing the power of stars”

      • hauiA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure. Agree on all points. But beware of the hype. Its a pattern. Every couple of days there is another hype and mostly its nothing burgers but it keeps attention diverted from the actual problems.

        Right now, we need to fight back fascists, take down capitalism (because it was fascism all along, no i’m not talking about trade), finish 100% renewables, outlaw ai outside of science and feed the world.

        Thats the only thing that actually matters. With the insane productivity after abandoning artificial inequality, we will probably have fusion in a couple months because the whole world can cooperate on it without “funding issues”.